CVE-2026-5547
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability has been found in Tenda AC10 16.03.10.10_multi_TDE01. Affected is the function formAddMacfilterRule of the file /bin/httpd. Such manipulation leads to os command injection. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. Multiple endpoints might be affected.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Tenda AC10 router firmware 16.03.10.10 contains an OS command injection vulnerability in the formAddMacfilterRule function within the /bin/httpd web server binary. Remote attackers can execute arbitrary operating system commands by injecting shell metacharacters into MAC filter rule parameters submitted to the affected function.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 16.03.10.10_multi_tde01CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Tenda AC10 router modelAccess router web interface or check device label/metadata to verify the model is Tenda AC10Affected if Device is not a Tenda AC10 router - this CVE does not apply
-
Check installed firmware versionLog into router web interface (typically 192.168.0.1) and navigate to System Settings > Firmware Upgrade, or check via telnet/SSH if enabled. Look for version string.Affected if Firmware version is NOT 16.03.10.10_multi_TDE01 - only this exact version is affected
-
Verify MAC filtering feature is accessibleLog into router web interface and check if MAC filtering settings page is reachable under Security or Access Control settingsAffected if MAC filtering feature is not accessible or not present in the web interface - exploitation requires this feature to be available
You are affected only if you have a Tenda AC10 router running exactly firmware version 16.03.10.10_multi_TDE01 with the MAC filtering web interface accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor firmware updates when available; in the interim, restrict network access to the router's management interface and segment the device from untrusted networks to reduce attack surface.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,440.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-5547 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-5547 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data