CVE-2026-6826
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedConcrete CMS 9.5.0 and below is vulnerable to unauthenticated file usage disclosure via missing permission check in the usage controller. Any unauthenticated visitor can request /ccm/system/dialogs/file/usage/{fID} with any file ID and receive a list of every page that references that file, including page IDs, handles, and full URLs. This includes pages that are otherwise restricted by permissions.The Concrete CMS security team gave this vulnerability a CVSS v.4.0 score of 6.9 with vector CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N. Thanks Eldudareeno for reporting.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceConcrete CMS 9.5.0 and below lacks proper permission validation in the file usage controller endpoint at /ccm/system/dialogs/file/usage/{fID}. Any unauthenticated attacker can submit arbitrary file IDs to this endpoint and receive a list of all pages referencing those files, including page IDs, handles, and full URLs—regardless of whether those pages have restricted access controls.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 9.5.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine Concrete CMS installed versionLog into the dashboard and navigate to Dashboard > System Information > Overview to view the version number, or check the version file in your installation directory if accessible.Affected if The installed version is below 9.5.1 (e.g., 9.5.0, 9.4.x, or earlier)
-
Test unauthenticated access to file usage endpointUsing a browser or curl command, visit http://your-site.com/ccm/system/dialogs/file/usage/1 without logging in. Replace '1' with any file ID that may exist on your site.Affected if The endpoint returns a successful HTTP response (200) with JSON data containing file usage information, without requiring login credentials
-
Verify endpoint exposes restricted page informationExamine the response from the unauthenticated request. Look for page IDs, page handles, or URLs that should not be visible to public users.Affected if The response includes file usage data showing references to pages that have restricted permissions or are not publicly accessible
-
Confirm the endpoint does not redirect to loginObserve whether accessing the /ccm/system/dialogs/file/usage/{fID} endpoint redirects you to a login page or returns an authentication error.Affected if The endpoint remains accessible and returns data without any authentication challenge or redirect
Your environment is affected if you are running Concrete CMS version 9.5.0 or below AND the /ccm/system/dialogs/file/usage/{fID} endpoint is accessible without authentication, exposing file references and page information that should require proper authorization.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped9.5.1
Implement authentication and authorization checks in the usage controller to verify the requesting user has appropriate permissions before disclosing file usage information. Until a patch is available, consider restricting access to the /ccm/system/dialogs/ path via web server configuration.
9.5.1
- Backup your database and files before upgrading
- Download Concrete CMS version 9.5.1 or later from the official source
- Follow the official Concrete CMS upgrade documentation to apply the update
- Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the dashboard version
- Test that the /ccm/system/dialogs/file/usage/{fID} endpoint now requires authentication
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,848.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-6826 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-6826 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data