CVE-2026-7890
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn Concrete CMS 9.5.0 and below, the RSS Displayer block accepts a feed URL from any page editor and fetches it server-side without validation enabling redirect-to-internal bypasses. The Concrete CMS security team gave this vulnerability a CVSS v.4.0 score of 2.1 with a vector CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Concrete CMS where the RSS Displayer block accepts a feed URL from page editors and fetches it server-side without validation. This enables attackers to make the server request internal resources by using redirect URLs, bypassing network isolation and potentially accessing internal services or sensitive data.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 9.5.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Concrete CMS versionCheck the installed Concrete CMS version by examining the application/core/VERSION file or accessing the dashboard at /dashboard/system/informationAffected if The installed version is below 9.5.1 (e.g., 9.5.0, 9.4.x, etc.)
-
Identify if RSS Displayer block is in useSearch for pages using the RSS Displayer block via the dashboard at /dashboard/pages/types or by searching the blocks table in the database for block_type_handle = 'rss_displayer'Affected if The RSS Displayer block is present and configured on any page in the site
-
Locate RSS Displayer block codeExamine the file system for packages/.../blocks/rss_displayer/ controller.php or similar path under the Concrete CMS installation directoryAffected if The RSS Displayer block exists and the controller contains code that accepts a feed_url parameter without validation
-
Check feed URL handling in block controllerInspect the controller file for fetch or HTTP request logic (e.g., file_get_contents, curl, GuzzleHttp) that processes the feed URL without validating it is an external HTTP(S) endpointAffected if The code makes server-side requests using user-provided URLs without validating the URL scheme, hostname, or IP address
-
Verify URL validation is absentSearch the block controller and related PHP files for URL validation functions such as filter_var, parse_url checks, or whitelist patterns for http/https onlyAffected if No validation exists to restrict feed URLs to external HTTP/HTTPS endpoints or reject internal IP ranges, localhost, or non-HTTP schemes like file://
A user is affected if they run Concrete CMS version below 9.5.1 AND have the RSS Displayer block enabled, as the block accepts arbitrary URLs without server-side validation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped9.5.1
Implement strict URL validation with an allowlist of permitted domains before fetching feeds, and disable automatic follow redirects when making server-side HTTP requests.
9.5.1
- Back up your Concrete CMS database and files.
- Download Concrete CMS version 9.5.1 from the official Concrete CMS release channels.
- Replace the existing files with the new version files.
- Run the upgrade process (e.g., via the dashboard or command line).
- Clear the application cache.
- Verify that the RSS Displayer block works correctly and the vulnerability is remediated.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-7890 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-7890 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data