CVE-2026-8140
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedConcrete CMS 9.5.0 and below does not validate a CSRF token before processing requests to /dashboard/extend/install/download/<remoteId>. The download() method in concrete/controllers/single_page/dashboard/extend/install.php checks only the canInstallPackages() permission before fetching a remote marketplace package and writing it to the server's DIR_PACKAGES directory. Because the endpoint is a state-changing GET route with no token enforcement, an attacker who can cause an authenticated administrator to visit a crafted page can force an arbitrary marketplace package to be downloaded. In order to be vulnerable, the victim must be passing canInstallPackages() and the site must be connected to the Concrete marketplace. The Concrete CMS security team gave this vulnerability a CVSS v.4.0 score of 7.5 with vector CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N. Thanks https://github.com/maru1009 for reporting.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceConcrete CMS 9.5.0 and below lacks CSRF token validation on the /dashboard/extend/install/download/<remoteId> endpoint. The download() method only checks canInstallPackages() permission but accepts state-changing GET requests without token enforcement, allowing attackers to force authenticated administrators to download arbitrary marketplace packages to the server's DIR_PACKAGES directory.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 9.5.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed Concrete CMS versionNavigate to /dashboard/system_information or check the version.php file in the application config directoryAffected if Version is 9.5.0 or lower
-
Verify marketplace connection statusCheck if the Concrete CMS site has a marketplace connection configured under /dashboard/system/environment/networkAffected if Marketplace connection is enabled and configured
-
Inspect package download directoryExamine the contents of the DIR_PACKAGES directory (typically /packages or /application/packages) for unexpected or unauthorized packagesAffected if Unknown or suspicious packages are present that were not intentionally installed
-
Review admin user permissionsCheck which users have canInstallPackages() permission under /dashboard/system/permissions/accessAffected if Untrusted or compromised admin accounts have package installation permissions
-
Audit marketplace download logsReview server logs for requests to /dashboard/extend/install/download/ from unexpected IP addresses or during periods of inactivityAffected if Unrecognized or unauthorized download requests are logged
A user is affected if their Concrete CMS version is 9.5.0 or lower, the marketplace connection is enabled, and they have administrators who could be tricked into triggering unauthorized package downloads.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedImplement CSRF token validation on the download() method before processing requests, or convert the GET route to POST and enforce token verification. Consider disabling marketplace connections if not required.
Concrete CMS 9.5.1 or later
- 1. Backup your Concrete CMS database and files before performing any upgrade.
- 2. Download Concrete CMS version 9.5.1 or later from the official Concrete CMS website (concretecms.com).
- 3. Replace the existing installation files with the new version, preserving your configuration and custom files.
- 4. Run the upgrade process by accessing your site - the upgrade script should automatically run.
- 5. Verify that the /dashboard/extend/install/ endpoint now requires CSRF token validation.
- 6. Test that package installation from the marketplace still works correctly for users with canInstallPackages permission.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-8140 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-8140 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data