CVE-2026-8239
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedConcrete CMS 9.5.0 and below is vulnerable to IDOR. The '/ccm/frontend/conversations/get_rating' endpoint confirms existence and returns rating score for any message by ID. The Concrete CMS security team gave this vulnerability a CVSS v.4.0 score of 6.3 with Vector CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N. Thanks Tristan Madani for reporting.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIDOR vulnerability in Concrete CMS where the '/ccm/frontend/conversations/get_rating' endpoint allows unauthenticated or unauthorized users to retrieve rating scores for any message by directly referencing its ID, confirming message existence and exposing data without ownership verification.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 9.5.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed Concrete CMS versionNavigate to the dashboard and go to Dashboard > System & Settings > Basics > Application > Version, or check the composer.json file in the web root for the 'concrete/core' version entryAffected if The installed version is less than 9.5.1 (e.g., 9.5.0, 9.4.x, 9.3.x, or any 8.x version)
-
Verify conversations feature is enabledLog into the admin dashboard and navigate to Dashboard > System & Settings > Conversation Settings, or check the database table 'Config' for the key 'conversations.enabled' set to 1Affected if Conversations are enabled on the site (the feature must be active for the vulnerable endpoint to exist)
-
Confirm the vulnerable endpoint existsMake a GET request to /ccm/frontend/conversations/get_rating without any authentication tokens or session cookiesAffected if The endpoint responds (even with an error) instead of returning HTTP 401/403, indicating the route is registered and accessible to unauthenticated users
-
Test IDOR vulnerability with message ID enumerationSend a GET request to /ccm/frontend/conversations/get_rating?messageID=1 (or any numeric ID) without authentication, then try different messageID valuesAffected if The endpoint returns rating data (or any JSON response with message details) for arbitrary message IDs without requiring authentication or authorization
The site is affected if it runs Concrete CMS version below 9.5.1, has the conversations feature enabled, and the /ccm/frontend/conversations/get_rating endpoint returns any rating data for unauthenticated requests with arbitrary message IDs.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped9.5.1
Implement proper authorization checks to verify the requesting user has permission to access the rating for the specified message ID before returning any data.
Concrete CMS 9.5.1
- Verify current Concrete CMS version by accessing the dashboard or checking the version file
- Backup the database and files before any upgrade
- Download Concrete CMS 9.5.1 from the official source (documentation.concretecms.org or concretecms.com)
- Follow the upgrade instructions in the Concrete CMS documentation for your specific deployment method
- After upgrading, verify the /ccm/frontend/conversations/get_rating endpoint now properly authorizes requests
- Test that conversation ratings can only be accessed by users with appropriate permissions
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-8239 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-8239 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data