CVE-2026-8337
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedConcrete CMS 9.5.0 and below is vulnerable to IDOR in surveys. To be vulnerable, a site would have to be configured in such a way that both public and private surveys are present on the site. An unauthenticated attacker can vote in the restricted survey by submitting the restricted optionID through the public survey’s endpoint. The Concrete CMS security team gave this vulnerability a CVSS v.4.0 score of 6.3 with vector CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N. Thanks Zer0daySec https://github.com/Zee99y for reporting
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIDOR vulnerability in Concrete CMS surveys allows unauthenticated attackers to vote in restricted (private) surveys by submitting the restricted optionID through the public survey endpoint. The attack requires the site to have both public and private surveys configured.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 9.5.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Concrete CMS versionLog into the dashboard and navigate to Dashboard > System & Settings > Basics > Maintenance Mode, or check the composer.json file in the installation root for the 'concrete5' or 'concretecms' version entryAffected if The installed version is lower than 9.5.1 (e.g., 9.5.0, 9.4.x, 9.x.x, or any version below 9.5.1)
-
Confirm survey functionality is enabledNavigate to Dashboard > Pages & Themes > Search for 'survey' in the add functionality area, or check the database table 'Packages' for an entry where packageID corresponds to the survey package (typically 'core_commerce' or custom survey package)Affected if The survey feature or survey-related package is installed and active
-
Identify active surveys in the systemQuery the database for survey blocks: look in tables like 'Blocks' where blockTypeHandle contains 'survey' or 'poll', or navigate to any page known to contain a survey and inspect the survey block configurationAffected if One or more surveys exist in the system, particularly surveys with restricted/private options configured
-
Check survey voting endpoint accessibilityInspect the survey block's form action URL (typically /index.php/tools/required/surveys/vote or similar endpoint) and verify if it accepts an optionID parameter without additional authorization token validationAffected if The survey voting endpoint accepts direct optionID submission without verifying that the user has permission to vote on the specific survey associated with that optionID
A system is affected if it runs Concrete CMS version below 9.5.1 and has active surveys with restricted/private options, where the voting endpoint does not validate that the submitted optionID belongs to a survey the user is authorized to vote on.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped9.5.1
Update Concrete CMS to a version above 9.5.0 when available, or implement proper access control validation on survey endpoints to ensure users can only vote in surveys they are authorized to access.
9.5.1 or later
- 1. Back up your Concrete CMS database and files before starting the upgrade process
- 2. Download Concrete CMS version 9.5.1 or later from the official source (documentation.concretecms.org)
- 3. Extract the new version files to your web server
- 4. Run the update process by navigating to /ccm/system/upgrade or using the concrete CLI tool
- 5. Verify the upgrade was successful by logging into the dashboard
- 6. Confirm the survey functionality works correctly with both public and private surveys
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-8337 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-8337 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data