CVE-2026-8411
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedConcrete CMS 9 before 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) at concrete/controllers/dialog/page/bulk/delete. The Concrete CMS security team gave this vulnerability a CVSS v.4.0 score of 2.3 with vector CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N. Thanks Yonatan Drori (Tenzai) for reporting.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceConcrete CMS 9 before version 9.5.0 lacks CSRF protection at the page bulk delete endpoint (concrete/controllers/dialog/page/bulk/delete). An attacker can craft a malicious page that, when visited by an authenticated administrator, triggers unintended bulk page deletions via forged requests. The CVSS v4.0 vector indicates low integrity impact (unauthorized deletions) but no confidentiality or availability impact.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 9.0.0, < 9.5.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine installed Concrete CMS versionLocate and inspect the version file or admin dashboard version display. Common locations include a version.php file in the application/config directory or the About page in the dashboard.Affected if The installed version is 9.0.0 through 9.5.0 (any version >= 9.0.0 and < 9.5.1)
-
Verify the affected controller file existsCheck for the presence of concrete/controllers/dialog/page/bulk/delete.php (or DeleteController.php) in the web root installation directory.Affected if The file exists in versions < 9.5.1 and the server is running the vulnerable codebase
-
Confirm admin access to bulk delete featureLog in as an administrator and navigate to the Pages or Dashboard area. Access the bulk operations menu for pages to verify the bulk delete dialog is available.Affected if An authenticated administrator user can access the bulk delete functionality in the CMS
-
Inspect the controller for CSRF protectionOpen the bulk delete controller file (concrete/controllers/dialog/page/bulk/delete.php) and search for anti-CSRF token validation. Look for calls to $this->validateCSRFToken() or similar token validation methods before the delete action executes.Affected if The controller lacks CSRF token validation code before the delete operation, indicating vulnerability
You are affected if your Concrete CMS installation is version 9.0.0 through 9.5.0 and administrators can access the bulk delete pages functionality without enforced CSRF token protection.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped9.5.1
Upgrade to Concrete CMS 9.5.0 or later which includes CSRF token validation at the vulnerable endpoint. Alternatively, implement anti-CSRF tokens on the bulk delete action if upgrading is not immediately feasible.
Concrete CMS 9.5.1 or later
- Backup your Concrete CMS database and files before upgrading
- Download Concrete CMS version 9.5.1 or later from the official Concrete CMS website or repository
- Follow the official upgrade documentation at documentation.concretecms.org to apply the update
- Verify the upgrade was successful by logging into the admin dashboard
- Test that the bulk delete functionality at concrete/controllers/dialog/page/bulk/delete works correctly post-upgrade
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-8411 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-8411 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data