CVE-2026-8412
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedConcrete CMS 9 before 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) at concrete/controllers/dialog/page/bulk/cache. The Concrete CMS security team gave this vulnerability a CVSS v.4.0 score of 2.3 with vector CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N. Thanks Yonatan Drori (Tenzai) for reporting.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Concrete CMS 9 before 9.5.0 at the bulk cache controller endpoint (concrete/controllers/dialog/page/bulk/cache). The affected endpoint lacks proper anti-CSRF token validation, allowing attackers to trick authenticated administrators into performing unintended cache management actions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 9.0.0, < 9.5.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Concrete CMS versionAccess the dashboard and navigate to Dashboard > System & Settings > Basics > Site Name, or check the version.php file in the application/config directory if you have file system access. The version is typically displayed on the dashboard footer or in the version file.Affected if Installed version is 9.0.0 through 9.5.0 (versions >= 9.0.0 and < 9.5.1 are affected)
-
Locate the vulnerable bulk cache endpointVerify the existence of the file concrete/controllers/dialog/page/bulk/cache.php in the web root. This is the endpoint handling bulk cache operations that lacks CSRF protection.Affected if The file concrete/controllers/dialog/page/bulk/cache.php exists in the installation and the CMS version falls within the affected range
-
Check access to bulk cache operationsLog in as an authenticated user with page editing permissions. Navigate to the page tree in the dashboard, select multiple pages, and look for bulk operations that include cache manipulation options (clear cache, refresh cache, etc.).Affected if The bulk cache operations feature is accessible to authenticated users in versions within the affected range
-
Verify CSRF protection status on the endpointExamine the cache.php controller file for presence of anti-CSRF token validation. Look for calls to $this->validateCSRFToken() or similar validation methods within the controller handling POST requests.Affected if The bulk cache endpoint lacks CSRF token validation and the CMS version is within the affected range
A user is affected if they are running Concrete CMS version 9.0.0 through 9.5.0 and have the bulk cache operations feature accessible to authenticated users without CSRF protection on that endpoint.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped9.5.1
Implement anti-CSRF token validation on the affected bulk cache endpoint. Upgrade to Concrete CMS 9.5.0 or later which contains the security fix.
Concrete CMS 9.5.1 or latest stable 9.x release
- 1. Backup your entire Concrete CMS installation including database and files
- 2. Review the Concrete CMS 9.5.1 release notes for any migration requirements
- 3. Place your site in maintenance mode via the dashboard or by creating a /application/config/site.php maintenance flag
- 4. Download Concrete CMS version 9.5.1 or the latest stable 9.x release from the official source
- 5. Replace core files, preserving your /application directory and any custom code
- 6. Run any database migrations if required by navigating to /index.php/ccm/system/upgrade or using the CLI
- 7. Clear all caches via the dashboard or CLI (concrete/bin concrete5 cache:clear)
- 8. Test critical functionality including the bulk cache operation at /ccm/system/dialogs/page/bulk/cache
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-8412 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-8412 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data