CVE-2026-8421
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedConcrete CMS 9.5.0 and below contains a CSRF vulnerability in the install_package() method of concrete/controllers/single_page/dashboard/extend/install.php. An attacker who can cause an authenticated administrator to visit a crafted page, and who has placed or caused a package to be present under DIR_PACKAGES/<handle>/, can force the installation of that package without any CSRF protection. Package installation executes the package controller's install() method as the web server user, enabling remote code execution. In order to be vulnerable, the victim must be passing canInstallPackages. The Concrete CMS security team gave this vulnerability a CVSS v.4.0 score of 7.5 with vector CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N. Thanks https://github.com/maru1009 for reporting.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceConcrete CMS 9.5.0 and below lacks CSRF protection in the install_package() method of the dashboard package installer controller. An attacker who tricks an authenticated administrator with canInstallPackages permission to visit a crafted page can silently force installation of a pre-placed malicious package, executing arbitrary code via the package controller's install() method running as the web server user.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 9.5.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Concrete CMS versionCheck the version file (typically at /concrete/version.php or /application/config/version.php) or access the dashboard About pageAffected if Installed version is below 9.5.1 (any version 9.5.0 or lower)
-
Locate the vulnerable controller fileExamine the file at concrete/controllers/single_page/dashboard/extend/install.php and search for the install_package() methodAffected if File exists and the install_package() method lacks concrete.token validation (no $this->validateToken() or $token->validate() call)
-
Check package directory permissionsInspect the DIR_PACKAGES directory (typically /packages) and verify if it is writable by the web server userAffected if The packages directory is writable by the web server process, allowing file placement by an attacker
-
Verify administrator session exposure riskReview if administrators with canInstallPackages permission log in from browsers that could visit untrusted sites while authenticatedAffected if Administrators with package installation privileges browse other sites while logged into Concrete CMS dashboard
You are affected if running Concrete CMS version 9.5.0 or below AND the install_package() method lacks CSRF token validation AND the packages directory is writable.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped9.5.1
Implement CSRF token validation in the install_package() form and server-side handler, and ensure all package installation actions require valid tokens. Alternatively, restrict the canInstallPackages permission to only highly trusted administrators and monitor for unauthorized package installations.
Concrete CMS 9.5.1
- Backup your Concrete CMS database and files before upgrading
- Download Concrete CMS version 9.5.1 from the official source at documentation.concretecms.org
- Upload and extract the 9.5.1 files to your web server, overwriting existing files
- Run the database upgrade script if required (typically via the dashboard or command line)
- Verify the installation by logging in as an administrator
- Navigate to Dashboard > Extend > Install to confirm CSRF protection is now in place
- Test that package installation works normally
- Review package directory (DIR_PACKAGES) to ensure no unauthorized packages were added during the vulnerability window
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-8421 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-8421 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data