Concrete CmsApplication · Concretecms

CVE-2026-8427

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-05-21
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 9.5.1 or later.
See remediation →
95/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Concrete CMS 9 before 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) at concrete/controllers/backend/file removeFavoriteFolder($id). The Concrete CMS security team gave this vulnerability a CVSS v.4.0 score of 2.3 with vector CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N. Thanks Yonatan Drori (Tenzai) for reporting.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

CSRF vulnerability in Concrete CMS 9 before 9.5.0 in the removeFavoriteFolder($id) endpoint of the backend file controller. An attacker can craft a malicious link that, when clicked by an authenticated user, causes the user unknowingly to remove their favorite folder. The CVSS v4.0 vector shows integrity impact (VI:L) but no confidentiality or availability impact.

MitigationImplement anti-CSRF tokens (synchronizer token pattern) on the removeFavoriteFolder action and ensure all state-changing requests require valid tokens. Upgrade to Concrete CMS 9.5.0 or later if available.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Concrete CmsApplication
Affected:>= 9.0.0, < 9.5.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Concrete CMS version
    Locate the version file or check the dashboard footer for the installed Concrete CMS version number
    Affected if The installed version is 9.0.0 through 9.5.0 (inclusive)
  2. Locate the backend file controller
    Navigate to the backend file controller source code that handles the removeFavoriteFolder($id) function
    Affected if The controller exists in the codebase and is accessible to authenticated users
  3. Inspect removeFavoriteFolder endpoint for CSRF protection
    Open the removeFavoriteFolder function in the file controller and examine whether concrete.secure.key or similar CSRF token validation is performed before processing the request
    Affected if The function lacks CSRF token validation logic
  4. Verify endpoint accessibility
    Check if the removeFavoriteFolder endpoint can be reached without a valid CSRF token in the request (such as via form submission or AJAX call)
    Affected if The endpoint processes requests without requiring a valid CSRF token

A user is affected if their Concrete CMS installation is version 9.0.0 through 9.5.0 and the removeFavoriteFolder endpoint lacks CSRF token validation.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 9.5.1 or later
Fixed in 9.5.1
Interim mitigation

Implement anti-CSRF tokens (synchronizer token pattern) on the removeFavoriteFolder action and ensure all state-changing requests require valid tokens. Upgrade to Concrete CMS 9.5.0 or later if available.

Recommended fix High confidence

Concrete CMS 9.5.1 or later

  1. 1. Backup your Concrete CMS database and files before proceeding with any upgrade.
  2. 2. Download Concrete CMS version 9.5.1 or later from the official Concrete CMS website (documentation.concretecms.org).
  3. 3. Extract the new version files and replace the existing installation files, preserving your configuration and application-specific files.
  4. 4. Run the database upgrade process by accessing your site - Concrete CMS will automatically prompt for migration if needed.
  5. 5. Verify the upgrade was successful by logging into the admin dashboard and checking the version number.
  6. 6. Test that the file removeFavoriteFolder functionality works correctly after the upgrade.
Caveat Review the Concrete CMS 9.5.1 release notes for any breaking changes or feature modifications before upgrading

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Concrete Cms Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
11.0 hours of engineering $1,930
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-8427 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-8427 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data