CVE-2026-8434
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedConcrete CMS 9 before 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) at concrete/controllers/backend/file rescanMultiple(). The Concrete CMS security team gave this vulnerability a CVSS v.4.0 score of 2.3 with vector CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N. Thanks Yonatan Drori (Tenzai) for reporting.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceCross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Concrete CMS 9 before 9.5.0 in the file rescanMultiple() controller endpoint. The vulnerability allows attackers to induce authenticated users to perform unintended file rescanning operations. The CVSS v4.0 score of 2.3 reflects the low integrity impact (only file metadata changes) and requirement for user interaction, though v3.1 scores it higher at 8.8.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 9.0.0, < 9.5.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Concrete CMS installed versionAccess the Concrete CMS dashboard and navigate to Dashboard > System & Settings > About, or check the version file in your installation (typically in concrete/version.php or via composer.json). Compare the version number against the affected range.Affected if The installed version is 9.0.0 through 9.5.0 (anything >= 9.0.0 and < 9.5.1)
-
Verify admin authentication is required for the vulnerable endpointConfirm that the rescanMultiple() function in the backend file controller requires an authenticated administrator session to be accessed.Affected if The site uses admin accounts and the file manager functionality is accessible to authenticated administrators
-
Identify if file manager with rescan functionality is enabledCheck if the File Manager feature is enabled in Concrete CMS by navigating to Dashboard > Files > File Manager or inspecting the file storage configuration in the database.Affected if The File Manager is enabled and accessible to administrators
-
Confirm presence of affected controller fileLocate the backend controller file containing the rescanMultiple() function in your Concrete CMS installation (typically under concrete/controllers/backend/ or similar path) and verify its existence and version timestamp.Affected if The vulnerable rescanMultiple() function exists in the backend controller
You are affected if your Concrete CMS installation version is 9.0.0 through 9.5.0 and administrators have access to the file manager functionality containing the vulnerable rescanMultiple() endpoint.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped9.5.1
Upgrade Concrete CMS to version 9.5.0 or later. Until then, implement anti-CSRF tokens on the affected endpoint and consider disabling the vulnerable functionality if upgrade is not immediately feasible.
Concrete CMS 9.5.1 or later
- 1. Back up your Concrete CMS database and files before making any changes
- 2. Download Concrete CMS version 9.5.1 or later from the official source (documentation.concretecms.org or concretecms.com)
- 3. Extract the new version files and upload them to your server, overwriting the existing installation
- 4. Run the database upgrade process by accessing your site - typically this happens automatically on first access after upgrade
- 5. Verify the upgrade was successful by logging into the admin dashboard
- 6. Test that the file rescanMultiple() functionality works correctly in the backend
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-8434 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-8434 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data