Rational ClearquestApplication · Ibm

CVE-2008-5327

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v2.0 Published 2008-12-05
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
71/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The ClearQuest Maintenance Tool in IBM Rational ClearQuest 7 before 7.1 stores the database password in cleartext in an object in a ClearQuest connection profile or export file, which allows remote authenticated users to obtain sensitive information by locating the password object within the object tree.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The ClearQuest Maintenance Tool in IBM Rational ClearQuest versions prior to 7.1 stores database passwords in cleartext (unencrypted) within connection profile objects or export files. Any authenticated user with access to the ClearQuest object tree can locate and read these stored passwords, leading to unauthorized database access.

MitigationUpgrade to IBM Rational ClearQuest version 7.1 or later where passwords are no longer stored in cleartext. Additionally, change any passwords that may have been exposed via this vulnerability.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Rational ClearquestApplication
Affected:= 7.0= 7.0.0.0= 7.0.0.1= 7.0.0.2= 7.0.0.3= 7.0.1= 7.0.1.1= 7.0.1.2= 7.0.2

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
Single
Confidentiality
Partial
Integrity
Partial
Availability
Partial

AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the installed ClearQuest version
    Use the ClearQuest client or CQWeb interface to view the product version information, typically found in Help > About or through the cqversion command-line utility
    Affected if The installed version is 7.0, 7.0.0.0, 7.0.0.1, 7.0.0.2, 7.0.1, 7.0.1.1, 7.0.1.2, or 7.0.2 (any version prior to 7.1)
  2. Locate connection profile objects
    Access the ClearQuest Maintenance Tool or object browser and navigate to connection profile objects stored in the ClearQuest repository
    Affected if Connection profiles exist and are accessible to authenticated users in the object tree
  3. Inspect connection profile password fields
    Open connection profile objects and examine any password or credential fields stored within them
    Affected if Passwords appear as plain text or unencrypted strings rather than masked or encrypted values
  4. Search for ClearQuest export files
    Search for .csv, .xml, or ClearQuest export files on the server or in shared directories where backup or export data may be stored
    Affected if Export files contain connection profile data with readable (unencrypted) password values
  5. Verify ClearQuest Maintenance Tool usage
    Confirm that the ClearQuest Maintenance Tool has been used to create or modify connection profiles, which is the vulnerable component
    Affected if Connection profiles were created or modified using the Maintenance Tool in affected versions

A user is affected if they run any ClearQuest version prior to 7.1 and have connection profiles that store database passwords in an unencrypted (readable text) format accessible through the Maintenance Tool or exported files.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade to IBM Rational ClearQuest version 7.1 or later where passwords are no longer stored in cleartext. Additionally, change any passwords that may have been exposed via this vulnerability.

Fix this in Rational Clearquest Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation3.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
8.0 hours of engineering $1,420
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2008-5327 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2008-5327 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data