CVE-2010-3758
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMultiple stack-based buffer overflows in FastBackServer.exe in the Server in IBM Tivoli Storage Manager (TSM) FastBack 5.5.0.0 through 5.5.6.0 and 6.1.0.0 through 6.1.0.1 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via vectors involving the (1) AGI_SendToLog (aka _SendToLog) function; the (2) group, (3) workgroup, or (4) domain name field to the USER_S_AddADGroup function; the (5) user_path variable to the FXCLI_checkIndexDBLocation function; or (6) the _AGI_S_ActivateLTScriptReply (aka ActivateLTScriptReply) function. NOTE: this might overlap CVE-2010-3059.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceMultiple stack-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities exist in IBM TSM FastBack Server (versions 5.5.0.0-5.5.6.0 and 6.1.0.0-6.1.0.1). The FastBackServer.exe service contains overflows in six distinct locations: the AGI_SendToLog function, three different fields (group, workgroup, domain name) passed to USER_S_AddADGroup, the user_path variable to FXCLI_checkIndexDBLocation, and the _AGI_S_ActivateLTScriptReply function. These allow remote unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary code via specially crafted network packets.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 5.5.0= 5.5.1= 5.5.2= 5.5.2.0= 5.5.3.0= 5.5.4.0= 5.5.5.0= 5.5.6.0= 6.1.0.0= 6.1.0.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify if IBM TSM FastBack Server is installedCheck for the presence of the FastBack Server installation directory (typically in Program Files/IBM/Tivoli Storage Manager FastBack) or look for the FastBackServer.exe binaryAffected if The FastBackServer.exe file exists on the system
-
Identify the installed FastBack versionCheck the version of FastBackServer.exe by right-clicking the file, selecting Properties, and viewing the Details tab, or use the command: dir "C:\Program Files\IBM\Tivoli Storage Manager FastBack\FastBackServer.exe" /sAffected if The version matches 5.5.0.0 through 5.5.6.0 or 6.1.0.0 through 6.1.0.1
-
Confirm if the FastBackServer service is runningOpen Services console (services.msc) and locate the FastBack Server service, or run: sc query FastBackServerAffected if The service status shows as RUNNING
-
Check network exposure of the FastBack Server portRun netstat -an | findstr "PORT" where PORT is the FastBack Server listener port (default 11460 or 11461), or review firewall rules for inbound access to the FastBack serviceAffected if The FastBack Server port is listening on a network-facing interface and accessible from untrusted networks
A user is affected if IBM TSM FastBack Server versions 5.5.0.0-5.5.6.0 or 6.1.0.0-6.1.0.1 are installed with the FastBackServer.exe service running and exposed to the network.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to IBM Tivoli Storage Manager FastBack version 6.1.0.2 or later, which contains the vendor patch. If immediate patching is not possible, restrict network access to the FastBack server port and disable the service if non-essential.
IBM TSM FastBack 5.5.6.1 or later, or 6.1.0.2 or later (obtain latest available from IBM)
- 1. Identify the current installed version of IBM TSM FastBack Server by checking the About or version information in the FastBack Manager console
- 2. Obtain the latest IBM Tivoli Storage Manager FastBack fix pack or interim fix from IBM Support (https://www.ibm.com/support)
- 3. Stop the FastBack Server service before applying the update
- 4. Apply the latest available fix pack or security patch for TSM FastBack
- 5. Restart the FastBack Server service after the patch is applied
- 6. Verify the server is running correctly and test critical backup/restore operations
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,680.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2010-3758 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2010-3758 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data