CVE-2011-4533
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedzenAdminSrv.exe in Ing. Punzenberger COPA-DATA zenon 6.51 SP0 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted packet to TCP port 50777, aka Reference Number 25240.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe zenAdminSrv.exe service in COPA-DATA zenon 6.51 SP0 contains a vulnerability that allows remote attackers to send crafted packets to TCP port 50777, causing either a denial of service (daemon crash) or potentially executing arbitrary code on the affected system.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 6.51CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- Partial
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if zenAdminSrv.exe service is runningCheck running processes or services list for zenAdminSrv.exe or zenAdminSrvAffected if The service is present and running on the system
-
Verify the installed zenon version is 6.51Check the installed zenon product version through the software inventory, program files information, or zenon-specific version query methodAffected if The installed version equals exactly 6.51 (no service pack or patch applied)
-
Confirm TCP port 50777 is open and listeningUse netstat or port scanning tool to check if port 50777 is in LISTENING state on the systemAffected if Port 50777 is exposed and accepting connections
-
Determine if the service is network-accessibleVerify network binding configuration or firewall rules to confirm the service port is reachable from network endpointsAffected if TCP port 50777 is accessible from untrusted network segments
You are affected if zenon version 6.51 is installed with the zenAdminSrv.exe service running and TCP port 50777 is exposed on the network.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataRestrict network access to TCP port 50777 through firewall rules or network segmentation, apply available vendor patches, or disable the zenAdminSrv service if not required.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,488.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2011-4533 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2011-4533 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data