ZenonApplication · Copadata

CVE-2019-15638

HIGH · 7.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2019-12-04
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 8.10 or later.
See remediation →
81/100
Remediation priority · High
No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
COPA-DATA zenone32 zenon Editor through 8.10 has an Uncontrolled Search Path Element.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

The zenon Editor through version 8.10 contains an uncontrolled search path element vulnerability, allowing the application to load libraries from untrusted or user-controlled locations. This DLL hijacking flaw could enable an attacker to execute arbitrary code by placing malicious DLLs in directories the application searches when loading resources.

MitigationUpgrade to a patched version of zenon Editor beyond 8.10. In the interim, restrict file system permissions and ensure only trusted, signed binaries exist in directories within the application's search path.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
ZenonApplication
Affected:<= 8.10

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify zenon Editor installation and version
    Open the zenon Editor application and navigate to Help > About, or check the program files directory for zenon (typically C:\Program Files\COPA-DATA\zenon 8.10 or similar). Locate the version information displayed in the application or in the executable properties.
    Affected if The installed version is 8.10 or any version lower than 8.10 (e.g., 8.00, 7.x, earlier releases).
  2. Verify DLL search path vulnerability exists
    Review the application's behavior when launching. Use a process monitoring tool (such as Process Monitor from Sysinternals) to observe which directories the zenon Editor process searches when loading DLLs. Check if any user-writable directories (temp folders, user profiles, network shares) are in the search order before system directories.
    Affected if The application loads DLLs from directories that are writable by standard users or from locations outside the secure system directories (Windows\System32, program files directory).
  3. Inspect application directory for unsigned or unexpected DLLs
    Examine the main zenon installation folder (typically under C:\Program Files\COPA-DATA\) for any DLL files that appear unexpected, have recent modification dates differing from the rest of the binaries, or are unsigned (right-click DLL > Properties > Digital Signatures tab). Compare against known legitimate zenon DLLs.
    Affected if Unexpected DLL files exist in the zenon installation directory, particularly if they are not digitally signed by COPA-DATA or were modified after the original installation date.

You are affected if the zenon Editor version is 8.10 or earlier and the application loads DLLs from user-writable or non-system directories during startup.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 8.10
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to a patched version of zenon Editor beyond 8.10. In the interim, restrict file system permissions and ensure only trusted, signed binaries exist in directories within the application's search path.

Fix this in Zenon Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
22.0 hours of engineering $3,860
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-15638 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-15638 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data