Factorytalk Services PlatformApplication · Rockwellautomation

CVE-2012-4714

HIGH · 7.8 CVSS v2.0 Published 2013-04-18
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
87/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Integer overflow in RNADiagnostics.dll in Rockwell Automation FactoryTalk Services Platform (FTSP) CPR9, CPR9-SR1, CPR9-SR2, CPR9-SR3, CPR9-SR4, CPR9-SR5, CPR9-SR5.1, and CPR9-SR6 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (service outage or RNADiagReceiver.exe daemon crash) via UDP data that specifies a large integer value.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Integer overflow vulnerability in RNADiagnostics.dll in Rockwell Automation FactoryTalk Services Platform allows remote attackers to cause denial of service by sending specially crafted UDP packets containing large integer values. The overflow triggers a crash of the RNADiagReceiver.exe daemon, resulting in service outage.

MitigationApply available vendor patches for FactoryTalk Services Platform CPR9 versions. If no patch is available, implement network segmentation to restrict UDP traffic to the affected service and monitor for anomalous UDP traffic targeting the RNADiagReceiver service.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Factorytalk Services PlatformApplication
Affected:= cpr9

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
Complete

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify FactoryTalk Services Platform installation
    Check for FactoryTalk Services Platform installation in Windows Programs and Features or review installation directories (typically C:\Program Files\Rockwell Software\FactoryTalk Services Platform or similar)
    Affected if FactoryTalk Services Platform version cpr9 is installed
  2. Confirm installed version is CPR9
    Right-click on the installed FactoryTalk Services Platform entry in Programs and Features, select Properties, and verify the version shows 'cpr9' in the version field
    Affected if Installed version is exactly cpr9 (other versions are not affected by this specific CVE)
  3. Locate RNADiagReceiver.exe service
    Open Windows Services console (services.msc) and search for RNADiagReceiver service, or check Task Manager for RNADiagReceiver.exe process running
    Affected if RNADiagReceiver.exe service or process is present and running on the system
  4. Check UDP listener status for RNADiagnostics
    Use netstat -ano command to list UDP ports in listening state, particularly ports associated with RNADiagReceiver service (consult FactoryTalk documentation for default UDP port, typically in the 4445-4446 range for RNA services)
    Affected if The system is listening on UDP ports used by the RNADiagReceiver service and is network-accessible

A system is affected if it has FactoryTalk Services Platform version cpr9 installed with the RNADiagReceiver service running and exposing UDP listeners to network traffic.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply available vendor patches for FactoryTalk Services Platform CPR9 versions. If no patch is available, implement network segmentation to restrict UDP traffic to the affected service and monitor for anomalous UDP traffic targeting the RNADiagReceiver service.

Fix this in Factorytalk Services Platform Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
21.0 hours of engineering $3,680
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,888.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2012-4714 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2012-4714 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data