CVE-2013-1211
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCisco NX-OS on the Nexus 1000V does not properly handle authentication for Virtual Ethernet Module (VEM) to Virtual Supervisor Module (VSM) communication, which allows remote attackers to obtain VEM access via (1) spoofed STUN packets or (2) a crafted VMware ESXi instance, aka Bug ID CSCud14832.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceCisco NX-OS on the Nexus 1000V fails to properly authenticate Virtual Ethernet Module (VEM) to Virtual Supervisor Module (VSM) communications, allowing remote attackers to spoof STUN packets or deploy a crafted VMware ESXi instance to gain unauthorized VEM access.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- None
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Nexus 1000V deploymentRun 'show version' or 'show module' to confirm the device is a Cisco Nexus 1000V running NX-OSAffected if The system is a Nexus 1000V virtual switch running NX-OS
-
Check VEM-VSM communication statusRun 'show vem status' or 'show module vem' to verify if Virtual Ethernet Modules are connected to the Virtual Supervisor ModuleAffected if VEM modules are actively connected to the VSM
-
Verify STUN protocol configurationRun 'show stun' or 'show running-config | include stun' to check if STUN (Serial Tunnel) protocol is enabled for VEM-VSM communicationAffected if STUN protocol is configured and active for VEM communication
-
Inspect VSM management interface access controlsRun 'show running-config interface mgmt0' and check ACLs or security policies applied to the VSM management interfaceAffected if Management interface lacks restrictive ACLs or is accessible from untrusted networks
-
Check for unauthorized VEM registration attemptsRun 'show vem license' and 'show module' to verify only authorized VEMs are registered with the VSMAffected if Unknown or unauthorized VEMs appear in the module list
The environment is affected if it runs Cisco NX-OS on Nexus 1000V with VEM-VSM communication enabled and STUN in use, particularly if the VSM management interface is not protected by restrictive ACLs.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the Cisco patch for Bug ID CSCud14832 when available; otherwise, implement network segmentation and ACLs to restrict traffic to VSM management interfaces and block unauthorized STUN traffic.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2013-1211 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2013-1211 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data