CVE-2014-2634
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUnspecified vulnerability in the server in HP Service Manager (SM) 7.21 and 9.x before 9.34 allows remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions, and modify data or cause a denial of service, via unknown vectors.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceHP Service Manager versions 7.21 and 9.x before 9.34 contain an unspecified server-side vulnerability allowing remote attackers to bypass access controls and modify data or cause denial of service. The nature of the bypass suggests a privilege escalation or authentication bypass flaw in the web/application server layer.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 7.21= 9.21= 9.30= 9.31= 9.32= 9.33CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed HP Service Manager versionLocate the version information for your HP Service Manager installation. Check the SM server configuration, About dialog, or version file typically found in the installation directory. Common locations include the sm.ini file, registry entries on Windows, or the 'sm -version' command if accessible.Affected if The installed version is 7.21 or any 9.x version below 9.34 (such as 9.21, 9.30, 9.31, 9.32, or 9.33)
-
Confirm web/application server tier is in useVerify that the HP Service Manager web tier or application server component is deployed and active. This includes the SM Web Client, SM Servlet Engine, or third-party web server (IIS, Apache) configured to serve HP Service Manager pages.Affected if The web/application server tier is enabled and accessible, as the vulnerability exploits the web layer to bypass access controls
-
Check for unauthorized access attemptsReview access logs, security logs, and audit trails for the HP Service Manager web tier. Look for unusual requests, privilege escalation patterns, or operations performed by users without proper role permissions occurring around the timeframe of potential exploitation.Affected if Logs show actions performed with elevated privileges or access to functions that should be restricted for the authenticating user's role
You are affected if HP Service Manager version 7.21 or any 9.x version below 9.34 is installed and the web/application server tier is exposed, as this enables the access control bypass vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply HP Service Manager version 9.34 or later to address the access restriction bypass. Verify system integrity post-patch and review access logs for indicators of exploitation prior to patching.
HP Service Manager 9.34 or later (contact HP/HPE for 7.x line upgrade options)
- Verify current HP Service Manager version by checking the server or using SM version commands
- Schedule a maintenance window for the upgrade
- Back up the Service Manager database and configuration files
- Upgrade to HP Service Manager version 9.34 or later (for 9.x installations)
- For version 7.21, contact HP/HPE for upgrade options to a supported release
- After upgrade, verify the server starts successfully and test critical functions
- Review audit logs to confirm no unauthorized access occurred prior to the upgrade
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,256.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2014-2634 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2014-2634 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data