CVE-2015-0686
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe SNMP implementation in Cisco NX-OS 6.1(2)I2(3) on Nexus 9000 devices, when a Reset High Availability (HA) policy is configured, allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (device reload) via unspecified vectors, aka Bug ID CSCuq92240.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe SNMP implementation in Cisco NX-OS 6.1(2)I2(3) on Nexus 9000 switches contains a denial-of-service vulnerability triggered when a Reset High Availability (HA) policy is configured. An authenticated remote user sending certain unspecified SNMP packets can cause the device to unexpectedly reload, disrupting network services.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 6.1\(2\)i2\(3\)CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- M
- Authentication
- Single
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:M/Au:S/C:N/I:N/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the device modelRun 'show version' or 'show inventory' to confirm the device is a Cisco Nexus 9000 series switchAffected if Device is NOT a Nexus 9000 series switch - this CVE only applies to that platform
-
Check the NX-OS versionRun 'show version' and locate the 'NXOS' or 'system' version line. Compare it to the affected version 6.1(2)I2(3)Affected if Version is NOT exactly 6.1(2)I2(3) - only this specific version is affected
-
Verify SNMP is enabledRun 'show snmp' to check if SNMP is configured and enabled on the deviceAffected if SNMP is disabled or not configured - the attacker needs SNMP access to exploit this
-
Check for Reset HA policy configurationRun 'show ha policy' or 'show running-config | include ha' to determine if a Reset High Availability policy is configuredAffected if No Reset HA policy is configured - the vulnerability is only triggered when this specific policy is in place
A user is affected only if they have a Nexus 9000 switch running exactly NX-OS version 6.1(2)I2(3) with SNMP enabled and a Reset HA policy configured.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataRestrict SNMP access to trusted management networks and limit authenticated user privileges. Upgrade to a patched NX-OS version when available from Cisco. During remediation, schedule a maintenance window as the device will likely need to be reloaded after the upgrade.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,880.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2015-0686 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2015-0686 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data