Tivoli Storage Manager FastbackApplication · Ibm

CVE-2015-1938

HIGH · 10.0 CVSS v2.0 Published 2015-06-30
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The server in IBM Tivoli Storage Manager FastBack 6.1 before 6.1.12 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-1986.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

IBM Tivoli Storage Manager FastBack versions prior to 6.1.12 contain a command injection vulnerability allowing remote unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary commands on the server. The attack vector is unspecified but likely involves unsanitized input being passed to system shell commands. The CVSS 10 score indicates trivial exploitability with complete system compromise potential.

MitigationUpgrade IBM Tivoli Storage Manager FastBack to version 6.1.12 or later to remediate this vulnerability. Additionally, restrict network access to the FastBack server and monitor for indicators of compromise until the patch is applied.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Tivoli Storage Manager FastbackApplication
Affected:= 6.1.0.0= 6.1.1.0= 6.1.7.2= 6.1.8.0= 6.1.8.1= 6.1.9.0= 6.1.9.1= 6.1.10.0= 6.1.10.1= 6.1.11.0= 6.1.11.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Complete
Integrity
Complete
Availability
Complete

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify IBM Tivoli Storage Manager FastBack installation
    Check the installed version of IBM Tivoli Storage Manager FastBack using the vendor provided version information tools or check the program files directory for version metadata
    Affected if The installed version matches any of the affected versions: 6.1.0.0, 6.1.1.0, 6.1.7.2, 6.1.8.0, 6.1.8.1, 6.1.9.0, 6.1.9.1, 6.1.10.0, 6.1.10.1, 6.1.11.0, or 6.1.11.1
  2. Confirm the FastBack server service is exposed
    Determine if the FastBack server is accessible over the network by checking firewall rules, listening ports, and network accessibility from untrusted segments
    Affected if The FastBack server is reachable from network segments where untrusted users could send requests to it
  3. Review FastBack server logs for suspicious command patterns
    Examine FastBack server logs for unusual or unexpected command invocations, especially those containing shell metacharacters or suspicious executables
    Affected if Logs show execution of commands that were not initiated by legitimate administrative activity

You are affected if your IBM Tivoli Storage Manager FastBack version is 6.1.11.1 or earlier and the server is network accessible to untrusted users.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade IBM Tivoli Storage Manager FastBack to version 6.1.12 or later to remediate this vulnerability. Additionally, restrict network access to the FastBack server and monitor for indicators of compromise until the patch is applied.

Recommended fix High confidence

IBM Tivoli Storage Manager FastBack 6.1.12 or later

  1. Identify the current IBM Tivoli Storage Manager FastBack version by checking the installed software or consulting the IBM Inventory

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Tivoli Storage Manager Fastback Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
17.0 hours of engineering $2,900
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,640.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2015-1938 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2015-1938 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data