Unified MeetingplaceApplication · Cisco
CVE-2015-4233
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedSQL injection vulnerability in Cisco Unified MeetingPlace 8.6(1.2) allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary SQL commands via unspecified vectors, aka Bug ID CSCuu54037.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in Cisco Unified MeetingPlace version 8.6(1.2) allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary SQL commands through unspecified vectors in the web application. The vulnerability requires valid authentication credentials, but once authenticated, attackers can inject malicious SQL queries to potentially extract, modify, or delete database contents.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data
Unified MeetingplaceApplication
= 8.6\(1.2\)CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- Single
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- Partial
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed Cisco Unified MeetingPlace versionAccess the web administration interface or check the system via CLI with 'show version' or similar command. The version is typically displayed on the login page or in the System Information section of the admin console.Affected if The installed version is exactly 8.6(1.2)
-
Confirm the web application is accessibleVerify that the Cisco Unified MeetingPlace web interface is reachable at the configured URL (typically port 443 or 8443). Attempt to access the login page.Affected if The web application interface is exposed and reachable
-
Verify authentication is requiredConfirm that the web application requires login credentials. SQL injection in this CVE requires valid authentication credentials to be exploited.Affected if Authentication is enabled and required for web application access
You are affected if the installed Cisco Unified MeetingPlace version is exactly 8.6(1.2) and the web application with authentication is accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataRestrict application access to trusted authenticated users only until vendor patch is applied; implement strict input validation and parameterized queries on all user-supplied data; contact Cisco for specific patch (Bug ID CSCuu54037).
Fix this in Unified Meetingplace
Scoped from the published advisory
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,888.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2015-4233 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2015-4233 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data