Nx OsOperating system · Cisco

CVE-2015-4301

MEDIUM · 6.8 CVSS v2.0 Published 2015-08-19
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
74/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Cisco NX-OS on Nexus 9000 devices 11.1(1c) allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (device hang) via large files that are copied to a device's filesystem, aka Bug ID CSCuu77225.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Cisco NX-OS 11.1(1c) on Nexus 9000 switches contains a denial-of-service vulnerability where authenticated remote users copying large files to the device's filesystem can cause the device to hang. The vulnerability is triggered by insufficient handling of large file operations in the NX-OS filesystem subsystem.

MitigationUpgrade to a Cisco NX-OS version that addresses CSCuu77225. If immediate patching is not feasible, restrict filesystem write access to only trusted administrative accounts and implement file size limits on file transfers to mitigate the DoS vector.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Nx OsOperating system
Affected:= 11.1\(1c\)

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
Single
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
Complete

AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:N/A:C

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify NX-OS version
    Run 'show version' or 'show version | include NX-OS' and locate the displayed NX-OS version string
    Affected if The displayed version is exactly 11.1(1c)
  2. Confirm Nexus 9000 hardware
    Run 'show inventory' or 'show module' and check the model identifier in the output
    Affected if The hardware model indicates a Nexus 9000 series switch (such as N9K-C9312PC, N9K-C9508, N9K-9372PX, etc.)
  3. Check if file transfer services are enabled
    Run 'show running-config | include feature scp' or 'show running-config | include feature sftp' to see if SCP or SFTP server features are enabled
    Affected if SCP or SFTP file transfer services are enabled on the device
  4. Verify remote authentication access
    Run 'show running-config | include aaa' to check if remote AAA authentication (such as RADIUS or TACACS+) is configured, or check vty line configuration with 'show line'
    Affected if Remote authentication is enabled allowing authenticated remote users to access the device
  5. Check file copy capability for remote users
    Run 'show privilege' after logging in as a remote user, or review the role assignments with 'show role' to determine if the authenticated user has file operation privileges
    Affected if The authenticated remote user role permits copy or file transfer operations to the device filesystem

The device is affected if it is running NX-OS exactly version 11.1(1c) on Nexus 9000 hardware, and both remote authentication and file transfer services are enabled, allowing authenticated remote users to copy files to the device.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade to a Cisco NX-OS version that addresses CSCuu77225. If immediate patching is not feasible, restrict filesystem write access to only trusted administrative accounts and implement file size limits on file transfers to mitigate the DoS vector.

Fix this in Nx Os Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
10.0 hours of engineering $1,750
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2015-4301 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2015-4301 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data