CVE-2015-5408
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedHP CentralView Fraud Risk Management 11.1, 11.2, and 11.3; CentralView Revenue Leakage Control 4.1, 4.2, and 4.3; CentralView Dealer Performance Audit 2.0 and 2.1; CentralView Credit Risk Control 2.1, 2.2, and 2.3; CentralView Roaming Fraud Control 2.1, 2.2, and 2.3; and CentralView Subscription Fraud Prevention 2.0 and 2.1 allow remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-5406 and CVE-2015-5407.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceHP CentralView Fraud Risk Management and related products contain an information disclosure vulnerability allowing remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via unspecified vectors. The CVSS 6 (Medium) rating suggests the attack may require some authentication or have moderate access complexity.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 11.1= 11.2= 11.3= 2.1= 2.2= 2.3= 2.1= 2.2= 2.3= 2.0= 2.1= 2.0= 2.1= 4.1= 4.2= 4.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- High
- Authentication
- Single
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:L/AC:H/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed HP CentralView productReview installed software list or check program directories for HP CentralView Fraud Risk Management, Roaming Fraud Control, Credit Risk Control, Subscription Fraud Prevention, Dealer Performance Audit, or Revenue Leakage ControlAffected if Any HP CentralView product from the affected product line is installed
-
Determine installed versionUse system inventory tools, check registry entries, or examine version files within the HP CentralView installation directory to identify the exact product versionAffected if Version matches 11.1, 11.2, or 11.3 for Fraud Risk Management; 2.1, 2.2, or 2.3 for Roaming Fraud Control or Credit Risk Control; 2.0 or 2.1 for Subscription Fraud Prevention or Dealer Performance Audit; or 4.1, 4.2, or 4.3 for Revenue Leakage Control
-
Verify product is network accessibleCheck firewall rules, network bindings, or listen configurations to determine if the HP CentralView application is exposed to network or remote accessAffected if The product is accessible over a network and responds to remote requests
-
Review access logs for unauthorized queriesExamine application and web server logs for unusual or unexpected information retrieval attempts from external sourcesAffected if Logs show unexpected or unauthorized information disclosure requests
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply HP vendor patches as they become available for the affected CentralView product versions. Until patches are released, restrict network access to these systems and monitor for unauthorized access attempts.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,616.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2015-5408 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2015-5408 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data