Centralview Fraud Risk ManagementApplication · Hp

CVE-2017-8992

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.0 Published 2018-08-06
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 6.1 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
HPE has identified a remote privilege escalation vulnerability in HPE CentralView Fraud Risk Management earlier than version CV 6.1. This issue is resolved in HF16 for HPE CV 6.1 or subsequent version.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

HPE CentralView Fraud Risk Management contains a remote privilege escalation vulnerability allowing unauthenticated attackers to gain elevated privileges on the system. The flaw exists in versions prior to CV 6.1 and is remotely exploitable with a critical CVSS score of 9.8.

MitigationApply HF16 for HPE CV 6.1 or upgrade to version CV 6.1 or subsequent to remediate this vulnerability.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Centralview Fraud Risk ManagementApplication
Affected:< 6.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm HPE CentralView Fraud Risk Management installation
    Locate the HPE CentralView Fraud Risk Management installation directory or check for the application in the system inventory
    Affected if The application is installed on the system
  2. Identify installed version
    Check the application version through its built-in about dialog, version file in the installation directory, or enterprise software inventory tools
    Affected if The installed version cannot be determined or is listed as less than 6.1
  3. Verify version against affected range
    Compare the identified version number to the affected range: any version prior to CV 6.1
    Affected if The installed version is 6.0, 5.x, or any earlier release, indicating it is prior to version 6.1
  4. Check if application is exposed to network
    Determine if the HPE CentralView Fraud Risk Management web interface or services are accessible from external or untrusted networks
    Affected if The application web interface is remotely accessible without authentication filters in place

The environment is affected if HPE CentralView Fraud Risk Management is installed and the version is lower than 6.1, especially if the interface is network-accessible.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 6.1 or later
Fixed in 6.1
Interim mitigation

Apply HF16 for HPE CV 6.1 or upgrade to version CV 6.1 or subsequent to remediate this vulnerability.

Recommended fix High confidence

HPE CV 6.1 with HF16 applied, or CV 6.1+ subsequent version

  1. Backup the current HPE CentralView Fraud Risk Management installation and database
  2. Download HPE CentralView Fraud Risk Management version CV 6.1 or a subsequent version from support.hpe.com
  3. If using CV 6.1, apply HF16 (HotFix 16) which contains the security fix for CVE-2017-8992
  4. Alternatively, upgrade to any version subsequent to CV 6.1 which includes the vulnerability resolution
  5. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the version information
  6. Test that the application functions normally after the upgrade
Caveat Review HPE release notes for CV 6.1 to check for any compatibility or configuration changes before upgrading

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Centralview Fraud Risk Management Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
20.0 hours of engineering $3,500
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-8992 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-8992 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data