Centralview Fraud Risk ManagementApplication · Hp

CVE-2018-7068

MEDIUM · 6.1 CVSS v3.0 Published 2018-08-06
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 6.1 or later.
See remediation →
68/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
HPE has identified a remote HOST header attack vulnerability in HPE CentralView Fraud Risk Management earlier than version CV 6.1. This issue is resolved in HF16 for HPE CV 6.1 or subsequent version.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

HPE CentralView Fraud Risk Management versions earlier than CV 6.1 are vulnerable to HOST header injection, where the application trusts and uses the HTTP Host header without proper validation. This allows remote attackers to manipulate the Host header value to conduct attacks such as cache poisoning, password reset token hijacking, or routing-based attacks.

MitigationApply HPE HF16 for CV 6.1 or upgrade to CV 6.1 subsequent version to patch the HOST header validation vulnerability.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Centralview Fraud Risk ManagementApplication
Affected:< 6.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify HPE CentralView Fraud Risk Management version
    Locate the installed version of HPE CentralView Fraud Risk Management. This is typically found in the product's About section, in installation directories, or via command-line version queries specific to the HPE product suite.
    Affected if The version is earlier than 6.1 (e.g., 6.0, 5.x, or earlier)
  2. Verify password reset functionality uses Host header
    Inspect the application's password reset or account recovery mechanism. Examine the code or configuration that handles password reset links. Determine whether the Host header value from incoming requests is used to construct reset URLs without sanitization.
    Affected if Password reset tokens are generated or delivered using the unsanitized HTTP Host header value
  3. Check for cache poisoning vectors
    Review any caching mechanisms (application-level, reverse proxy, or CDN) configured for the application. Determine if the Host header influences what content gets cached or retrieved from cache.
    Affected if The application or its reverse proxy caches responses based on the Host header without validation
  4. Inspect web server routing configuration
    Examine the web server (IIS, Apache, or other) configuration files for HPE CentralView. Look for virtual host configurations, routing rules, or rewrite rules that directly use the Host header for request routing or domain-based logic.
    Affected if The web server routes requests or applies configuration based on the Host header without validating its contents

The environment is affected if HPE CentralView Fraud Risk Management version is earlier than 6.1 AND the application processes HTTP Host headers in sensitive operations such as password reset, caching, or request routing without proper validation.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to 6.1 or later
Fixed in 6.1
Interim mitigation

Apply HPE HF16 for CV 6.1 or upgrade to CV 6.1 subsequent version to patch the HOST header validation vulnerability.

Fix this in Centralview Fraud Risk Management Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
12.0 hours of engineering $2,130
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-7068 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-7068 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data