CVE-2016-0213
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedStack-based buffer overflow in IBM Tivoli Storage Manager FastBack 5.5 and 6.1.x through 6.1.11.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2016-0212 and CVE-2016-0216.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in IBM Tivoli Storage Manager FastBack versions 5.5 and 6.1.x through 6.1.11.1. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash the FastBack daemon via unspecified vectors, potentially enabling remote code execution given the critical CVSS score of 9.8.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 5.5.0= 6.1.0= 6.1.0.0= 6.1.0.1= 6.1.1= 6.1.1.0= 6.1.2= 6.1.2.0= 6.1.3= 6.1.3.0= 6.1.4= 6.1.4.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if IBM Tivoli Storage Manager FastBack is installedSearch for FastBack installation directories or installed software listings. On Windows, check Add/Remove Programs or common installation paths like C:\Program Files\IBM\Tivoli\TSM\FastBack. On Unix/Linux, check /opt/IBM/Tivoli/TSM/FastBack.Affected if FastBack software is present on the system
-
Determine the installed FastBack versionLocate version information within the FastBack installation directory. Check for version files such as version.txt, about.txt, or inspect version metadata of the main executable (often named FBService.exe on Windows or fbed on Unix).Affected if Version matches 5.5.0 or any version in the 6.1.x line through 6.1.11.1
-
Verify the FastBack service is running and exposedCheck running processes for the FastBack daemon. On Windows, look for FBService.exe or related processes. On Unix, look for fbed. Use netstat or similar tools to check if the FastBack service port is listening on network interfaces.Affected if FastBack daemon is running and listening on a network-accessible interface
The environment is affected if IBM Tivoli Storage Manager FastBack version 5.5.0 or any 6.1.x version through 6.1.11.1 is installed with the FastBack daemon running and network-accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the latest IBM Tivoli Storage Manager FastBack patches or upgrade to a supported version beyond 6.1.11.1. If immediate patching is not feasible, restrict network access to the FastBack service and implement additional network segmentation controls.
Upgrade to the latest available version of Tivoli Storage Manager FastBack (version 6.1.12 or later, or the latest 6.1.x release beyond 6.1.11.1)
- 1. Identify the currently installed IBM Tivoli Storage Manager FastBack version by checking the program files or running the version command.
- 2. Confirm the installed version matches one of the affected versions: 5.5.0, 6.1.0, 6.1.0.0, 6.1.0.1, or any version 6.1.x through 6.1.11.1.
- 3. Backup all critical data and configurations before proceeding with the upgrade.
- 4. Download the latest available version of IBM Tivoli Storage Manager FastBack from IBM Fix Central or the IBM support portal.
- 5. Install the upgraded version following the IBM-provided installation instructions.
- 6. Verify the installation was successful and the new version is running.
- 7. Test that all expected functionality continues to work properly after the upgrade.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,080.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-0213 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-0213 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data