CVE-2016-0216
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedStack-based buffer overflow in IBM Tivoli Storage Manager FastBack 5.5 and 6.1.x through 6.1.11.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2016-0212 and CVE-2016-0213.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceStack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in IBM Tivoli Storage Manager FastBack versions 5.5 and 6.1.x through 6.1.11.1 allows remote attackers to crash the FastBack daemon via unspecified vectors. The critical CVSS score of 9.8 indicates severe potential impact, though the official description focuses on denial of service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 5.5.0= 6.1.0= 6.1.0.1= 6.1.1= 6.1.1.0= 6.1.2= 6.1.2.0= 6.1.3= 6.1.3.0= 6.1.4= 6.1.4.0= 6.1.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify IBM Tivoli Storage Manager FastBack is installedOn Windows, check Programs and Features or the Windows registry for IBM Tivoli Storage Manager FastBack. On Linux, check for RPM packages with 'rpm -qa | grep -i fastback' or inspect /opt directory for FastBack installation folders.Affected if FastBack software is found on the system
-
Identify the installed FastBack version numberOn Windows, locate the FastBack version via the About section in the FastBack GUI or check the registry under the FastBack installation key. On Linux, run 'rpm -qi' on the identified FastBack package or check version files in the installation directory.Affected if A version number is returned that matches the installed FastBack software
-
Compare installed version against affected rangesCompare the identified version to the affected list: 5.5.0, 6.1.0, 6.1.0.1, 6.1.1, 6.1.1.0, 6.1.2, 6.1.2.0, 6.1.3, 6.1.3.0, 6.1.4, 6.1.4.0, or 6.1.5Affected if The installed version is exactly 5.5.0 or falls within the 6.1.x range up to and including 6.1.5
-
Confirm the FastBack daemon service is exposedCheck network configuration to determine if the FastBack server listens on accessible network ports (default ports 11460 or similar) and whether those ports are reachable from network segments outside the trusted environment.Affected if The FastBack service is network-accessible and the version is within the affected range
The system is affected if IBM Tivoli Storage Manager FastBack version 5.5.0 or any 6.1.x version through 6.1.5 is installed and the service is network-accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the applicable IBM fix pack for Tivoli Storage Manager FastBack to address this vulnerability. If immediate patching is not possible, restrict network access to the FastBack service and monitor for anomalous activity.
Tivoli Storage Manager FastBack version 6.1.12 or later (or latest available supported release)
- 1. Identify the current installed version of IBM Tivoli Storage Manager FastBack by checking the server or using the administrative console.
- 2. Determine the appropriate upgrade path based on your current version - plan for either a major version jump or sequential updates.
- 3. Review IBM's official support lifecycle for Tivoli Storage Manager FastBack to identify the recommended fixed release.
- 4. Download the fixed version from IBM Fix Central (https://www-945.ibm.com/support/fixcentral/) or your authorized IBM distribution channel.
- 5. Before applying the upgrade, perform a complete backup of the TSM FastBack server configuration, database, and any critical data.
- 6. Schedule a maintenance window as upgrades may require service downtime.
- 7. Stop the TSM FastBack services following the documented procedure for your version.
- 8. Install the upgraded version following IBM's installation documentation for the target release.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-0216 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-0216 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data