CVE-2016-10783
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedcPanel before 60.0.25 allows self stored XSS in SSL_listkeys (SEC-182).
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidencecPanel before version 60.0.25 contains a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the SSL_listkeys function (SEC-182). The vulnerability allows injection of malicious scripts that are stored and executed when the user accesses their own key listings.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 11.54.0.0, < 11.54.0.33>= 55.9999.61, < 56.0.39>= 57.9999.48, < 58.0.37>= 59.9999.58, < 60.0.25CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check cPanel versionRun /usr/local/cpanel/cpanel -V or cat /usr/local/cpanel/version to obtain the installed cPanel version numberAffected if The installed version falls within these ranges: 11.54.0.0 to 11.54.0.32, 55.9999.61 to 56.0.38, 57.9999.48 to 58.0.36, or 59.9999.58 to 60.0.24
-
Confirm SSL keys feature is accessibleVerify that the cPanel SSL/TLS key management interface (SSL_listkeys function) is available to user accounts by checking if users can access the SSL Wizard or SSL/TLS section in cPanelAffected if The SSL/TLS feature is enabled and accessible to users in the cPanel interface
-
Inspect SSL key entries for injection markersReview stored SSL keys in /var/cpanel/ssl/cpanel/ or via cPanel API for unusual characters, script tags, or encoded payloads in key descriptions or filenames that could indicate prior exploitationAffected if Any SSL key entries contain suspicious content such as script tags, event handlers, or encoded JavaScript that was injected into key metadata
A user is affected if their cPanel version is within the affected ranges AND the SSL/TLS key listing feature is accessible to user accounts, with exploitation indicated by suspicious script content in stored SSL key data.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data11.54.0.3356.0.3958.0.37
Upgrade cPanel to version 60.0.25 or later to patch the XSS vulnerability in SSL_listkeys.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-10783 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-10783 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data