CVE-2016-1145
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedDirectory traversal vulnerability in WebManager in NEC EXPRESSCLUSTER X through 3.3 11.31 on Windows and through 3.3 3.3.1-1 on Linux and Solaris allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via unspecified vectors.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA directory traversal vulnerability exists in the WebManager component of NEC EXPRESSCLUSTER X. The flaw allows remote attackers to use path traversal sequences (e.g., '../') in unspecified input vectors to escape the intended directory and read arbitrary files on the host system.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 3.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm NEC EXPRESSCLUSTER X is installedLocate the ExpressCluster installation directory or check installed programs list for 'NEC EXPRESSCLUSTER X'Affected if The product is not present on the system
-
Verify the installed version is 3.3Check the ExpressCluster version through the cluster management tools or installed software details - look for version 3.3 specifically (the vulnerability affects version 3.3 exactly)Affected if The installed version is 3.3
-
Determine if WebManager component is enabledCheck if WebManager service or process is running, or inspect the cluster configuration for WebManager statusAffected if WebManager is enabled and running
-
Check WebManager network exposureIdentify which ports WebManager is listening on (typically ports 29003, 29004, or similar) and verify network accessibilityAffected if WebManager is accessible over the network (not localhost-only or blocked)
-
Inspect WebManager configuration for traversal protectionsReview WebManager configuration files for any input validation or path restrictions on file access operationsAffected if No traversal protections are configured or they are disabled
The system is affected if NEC EXPRESSCLUSTER X version 3.3 is installed with WebManager enabled and network-accessible, allowing unauthenticated attackers to potentially read arbitrary files via path traversal.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataRestrict network access to WebManager to trusted IPs only, apply vendor patches when released, and disable WebManager if not required.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-1145 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-1145 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data