CVE-2016-4510
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe WAP interface in Trihedral VTScada (formerly VTS) 8.x through 11.x before 11.2.02 allows remote attackers to bypass authentication and read arbitrary files via unspecified vectors.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is an authentication bypass vulnerability in the WAP (Wireless Application Protocol) interface of Trihedral VTScada SCADA software versions 8.x through 11.x before 11.2.02. The flaw allows unauthenticated remote attackers to read arbitrary files on the system, indicating a complete failure of the authentication mechanism in the WAP component.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 10.1.05= 10.1.06= 10.1.07= 10.1.12= 10.0.11= 10.0.13= 10.0.14= 10.0.16= 10.0.17= 11.1.05= 11.1.06= 11.1.09CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate VTScada installationCheck common installation directories such as C:\Program Files\Trihedral\VTScada or /opt/vtscada, or search for vtscada.exe on Windows systems.Affected if VTScada software is found on the system
-
Identify installed VTScada versionLocate the version information in the installation folder, typically in a file named about.txt, version.ini, or check the executable properties of vtscada.exe.Affected if The version number matches 8.x through 11.x before 11.2.02, or specifically equals any of these: 10.1.05, 10.1.06, 10.1.07, 10.1.12, 10.0.11, 10.0.13, 10.0.14, 10.0.16, 10.0.17, 11.1.05, 11.1.06, or 11.1.09
-
Determine if WAP interface is enabledCheck the VTScada configuration or services for the WAP (Wireless Application Protocol) component. This may be visible in the VTScada Service Manager, configuration files, or running network services on ports typically used by WAP.Affected if The WAP interface is active, listening on a network port, or configured to run
-
Verify WAP authentication configurationInspect the WAP configuration settings within VTScada to confirm authentication is not properly enforced, or attempt a test request to the WAP endpoint without credentials to observe if access is granted.Affected if The WAP interface accepts unauthenticated requests or shows no authentication challenge
You are affected if VTScada is installed with a version between 8.x and 11.x prior to 11.2.02 and the WAP interface is enabled or accessible on the network.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade VTScada to version 11.2.02 or later to patch this vulnerability. If upgrading is not immediately possible, disable or restrict access to the WAP interface until the patch can be applied.
VTScada 11.2.02 or later
- Download VTScada version 11.2.02 or later from the official Trihedral website or trusted distribution channel
- Review the official upgrade documentation for VTScada
- Ensure a complete backup of the current VTScada system including all configuration files, applications, and databases
- Test the upgrade in a non-production environment before deploying to production
- Stop all VTScada services prior to upgrade installation
- Install the upgraded VTScada version 11.2.02 or later
- Verify the WAP interface authentication is functioning correctly after upgrade
- Confirm that arbitrary file access is no longer possible without proper authentication
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing10.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,928.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-4510 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-4510 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data