CVE-2016-4532
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedDirectory traversal vulnerability in the WAP interface in Trihedral VTScada (formerly VTS) 8.x through 11.x before 11.2.02 allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via a crafted pathname.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA directory traversal vulnerability exists in the WAP interface of Trihedral VTScada versions 8.x through 11.x before 11.2.02. Remote attackers can exploit this by sending crafted requests containing '..' sequences in file paths, allowing unauthorized read access to arbitrary files on the host system.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 10.1.05= 10.1.06= 10.1.07= 10.1.12= 9.0.02= 9.0.03= 9.0.08= 9.1.02= 9.1.03= 9.1.05= 9.1.09= 9.1.11CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if Trihedral VTScada is installedCheck for VTScada installation directory, service, or application binary. Common locations include C:\Program Files\Trihedral VTScada or C:\VTScada. Look for VTScada service in Windows Services or check for vtscada.exe process.Affected if VTScada software is found on the system
-
Determine installed VTScada versionLocate version information in the installation directory, typically in a version file, about dialog, or registry key under HKLM\Software\Trihedral\VTScada. The version is displayed in the application title bar when running.Affected if Installed version matches 8.x through 11.x before 11.2.02, or specifically 9.0.02, 9.0.03, 9.0.08, 9.1.02, 9.1.03, 9.1.05, 9.1.09, 9.1.11, 10.1.05, 10.1.06, 10.1.07, or 10.1.12
-
Verify WAP interface is enabledCheck if the WAP web interface service is running. Inspect VTScada configuration files or web service settings for WAP (typically port 80/443 or configured web server port). Confirm the web interface is accessible over network.Affected if WAP web interface is enabled and accessible externally
-
Confirm vulnerability exposureReview network accessibility of the WAP interface. Determine if the WAP port is exposed to untrusted networks or the internet. Check firewall rules allowing external access to VTScada web ports.Affected if The WAP interface is network-accessible and version is in the affected range
The system is affected if Trihedral VTScada version 8.x through 11.x before 11.2.02 is installed with the WAP interface enabled and network-accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply vendor patch (VTScada 11.2.02 or later) to resolve the directory traversal vulnerability. Until patched, restrict network access to the WAP interface to reduce exposure.
VTScada 11.2.02 or later
- 1. Identify the current installed version of VTScada by checking the application or system information
- 2. Obtain VTScada version 11.2.02 or later from the official Trihedral vendor source
- 3. Review Trihedral VTScada upgrade documentation for your specific version
- 4. Back up the existing VTScada configuration and data according to backup procedures
- 5. Apply the upgrade to version 11.2.02 or later following vendor deployment instructions
- 6. Verify the WAP interface is functioning correctly after upgrade
- 7. Confirm the directory traversal vulnerability is resolved by testing with the patched version
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,392.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-4532 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-4532 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data