VtscadaApplication · Trihedral

CVE-2017-14029

HIGH · 7.8 CVSS v3.0 Published 2017-11-06
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 11.3.03 or later.
See remediation →
81/100
Remediation priority · High
No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
An Uncontrolled Search Path Element issue was discovered in Trihedral VTScada 11.3.03 and prior. The program will execute specially crafted malicious dll files placed on the target machine.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

This is a DLL hijacking (uncontrolled search path element) vulnerability in Trihedral VTScada 11.3.03 and prior. The application loads DLL files using insecure search paths, allowing attackers to place malicious DLLs in directories that the application searches (such as the current working directory or system paths). When the application runs, it inadvertently loads and executes the attacker's DLL instead of the legitimate one, achieving code execution in the context of the vulnerable application.

MitigationFix the application code to use fully qualified explicit paths for all DLL loads, enable safe DLL search mode (SetDllDirectory), and implement DLL signature verification/whitelisting to ensure only trusted DLLs are loaded.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
VtscadaApplication
Affected:<= 11.3.03

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify if Trihedral VTScada is installed
    Look for VTScada in the Windows installed programs list (Control Panel > Programs and Features) or check common installation directories such as C:\Program Files\Trihedral or C:\Program Files (x86)\Trihedral
    Affected if VTScada is found on the system
  2. Determine the installed VTScada version
    Right-click on the main VTScada executable (commonly vtScada.exe or similar) in the installation directory, select Properties, and view the Details tab for the Product Version. Alternatively, check the Windows registry under HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Trihedral or HKEY_CURRENT_USER\SOFTWARE\Trihedral for version information
    Affected if The version displayed is 11.3.03 or lower
  3. Compare version against affected range
    Compare the installed version number to the affected range: any version less than or equal to 11.3.03 is vulnerable. Version 11.3.04 and later are not affected
    Affected if The installed version is 11.3.03 or any prior version (e.g., 11.3.00, 11.2.x, earlier releases)
  4. Confirm the application uses insecure DLL search paths
    Inspect the application's DLL loading behavior using process monitoring tools (such as Process Monitor from Sysinternals) to observe which directories the application searches when loading DLLs. Look for DLL loads from the current working directory or system paths without using SetDllDirectory
    Affected if The application loads DLLs from directories controllable by an attacker (current directory or unwritable system paths)

A system is affected if Trihedral VTScada version 11.3.03 or lower is installed and the application loads DLLs from insecure search paths, allowing potential DLL hijacking by placing malicious DLLs in directories the application searches.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 11.3.03
Interim mitigation

Fix the application code to use fully qualified explicit paths for all DLL loads, enable safe DLL search mode (SetDllDirectory), and implement DLL signature verification/whitelisting to ensure only trusted DLLs are loaded.

Fix this in Vtscada Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
15.0 hours of engineering $2,560
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,096.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-14029 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-14029 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data