SparkApplication · Apache

CVE-2017-12612

HIGH · 7.8 CVSS v3.0 Published 2017-09-13
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
80/100
Remediation priority · High
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
In Apache Spark 1.6.0 until 2.1.1, the launcher API performs unsafe deserialization of data received by its socket. This makes applications launched programmatically using the launcher API potentially vulnerable to arbitrary code execution by an attacker with access to any user account on the local machine. It does not affect apps run by spark-submit or spark-shell. The attacker would be able to execute code as the user that ran the Spark application. Users are encouraged to update to version 2.2.0 or later.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The Apache Spark launcher API performs unsafe deserialization of data received through its socket connection in versions 1.6.0 through 2.1.1. An attacker with access to any user account on the local machine can exploit this to achieve arbitrary code execution as the user running the Spark application. This vulnerability only affects applications launched programmatically via the launcher API, not those run through spark-submit or spark-shell.

MitigationUpgrade Apache Spark to version 2.2.0 or later to remediate this vulnerability. Alternatively, audit and refrain from using the programmatic launcher API in affected versions.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
SparkApplication
Affected:= 1.6.0= 1.6.1= 1.6.2= 1.6.3= 2.0.0= 2.0.1= 2.0.2= 2.1.0= 2.1.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed Spark version
    Run `spark-submit --version` or check the SPARK_HOME directory for a version file
    Affected if The version is 1.6.0, 1.6.1, 1.6.2, 1.6.3, 2.0.0, 2.0.1, 2.0.2, 2.1.0, or 2.1.1
  2. Determine if programmatic launcher API is used
    Search source code for imports of `org.apache.spark.launcher` package or usage of `SparkLauncher` class
    Affected if The application uses SparkLauncher or related classes to launch Spark programmatically
  3. Identify socket-based launcher communication
    Review application code to see if it uses the socket-based launcher (default behavior when using SparkLauncher)
    Affected if The SparkLauncher is configured to use default socket-based communication (not Kerberos or other authentication)
  4. Check for untrusted local user access
    Audit local system accounts and filesystem permissions on the Spark working directory
    Affected if Local untrusted users have write access to the directory where Spark launcher socket communications occur

You are affected if Spark version is between 1.6.0 and 2.1.1 inclusive AND your application programmatically launches Spark using the launcher API without additional authentication on socket communications.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade Apache Spark to version 2.2.0 or later to remediate this vulnerability. Alternatively, audit and refrain from using the programmatic launcher API in affected versions.

Fix this in Spark Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation8.0 h
  • Implementation16.0 h
  • Testing12.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
40.0 hours of engineering $7,000
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $11,200.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-12612 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-12612 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data