GeodeApplication · Apache
CVE-2017-15695
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedWhen an Apache Geode server versions 1.0.0 to 1.4.0 is configured with a security manager, a user with DATA:WRITE privileges is allowed to deploy code by invoking an internal Geode function. This allows remote code execution. Code deployment should be restricted to users with DATA:MANAGE privilege.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIn Apache Geode versions 1.0.0 to 1.4.0, when configured with a security manager, the internal code deployment function incorrectly accepts DATA:WRITE privilege instead of requiring DATA:MANAGE. This allows any user with DATA:WRITE access to deploy and execute arbitrary code remotely on the Geode server.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data
GeodeApplication
>= 1.0.0, <= 1.4.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Apache Geode versionRun 'gfsh version' or check the geode-core JAR manifest, or query the JMX MBean for the Geode versionAffected if Version is between 1.0.0 and 1.4.0 inclusive
-
Verify security manager is configuredCheck geode.properties or cache.xml for 'security-manager' property, or look for security-client.xml configurationAffected if A security manager is explicitly configured (required for this vulnerability to be exploitable)
-
Check for DATA:WRITE privilege assignmentsReview security XML configuration files (e.g., security-*xml) or query the security service for users/roles with DATA:WRITE permissionAffected if Any user or role is granted DATA:WRITE permission (these users can exploit the flaw)
-
Confirm DATA:MANAGE is not requiredAttempt to use the code deployment function with only DATA:WRITE privileges, or inspect the authorization interceptor for the deploy operationAffected if Code deployment succeeds with only DATA:WRITE (vulnerable state confirmed)
User is affected if they run Apache Geode 1.0.0-1.4.0 with a security manager configured and have users granted DATA:WRITE privileges, as those users can deploy arbitrary code.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade Apache Geode to version 1.4.0.1 or later which contains the fix, or apply the vendor patch that restricts code deployment to require DATA:MANAGE privilege.
Fix this in Geode
Scoped from the published advisory
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,992.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-15695 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-15695 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data