CVE-2022-37021
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedApache Geode versions up to 1.12.5, 1.13.4 and 1.14.0 are vulnerable to a deserialization of untrusted data flaw when using JMX over RMI on Java 8. Any user still on Java 8 who wishes to protect against deserialization attacks involving JMX or RMI should upgrade to Apache Geode 1.15 and Java 11. If upgrading to Java 11 is not possible, then upgrade to Apache Geode 1.15 and specify "--J=-Dgeode.enableGlobalSerialFilter=true" when starting any Locators or Servers. Follow the documentation for details on specifying any user classes that may be serialized/deserialized with the "serializable-object-filter" configuration option. Using a global serial filter will impact performance.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceApache Geode versions up to 1.12.5, 1.13.4, and 1.14.0 contain a deserialization of untrusted data vulnerability in JMX over RMI when running on Java 8, allowing remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted serialized objects.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 1.12.5>= 1.13.0, <= 1.13.4= 1.14.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Apache Geode versionCheck the installed Geode version by running 'gfsh version' or inspecting the geode-core JAR manifest, or check the product documentation for the deployed versionAffected if The version is 1.14.0, or between 1.13.0 and 1.13.4 inclusive, or 1.12.5 or lower
-
Verify Java runtime versionRun 'java -version' or check the JAVA_HOME environment variable to determine which Java version is executing GeodeAffected if The Java runtime is version 8 (1.8.x) - this is required for the vulnerability to be exploitable
-
Confirm JMX over RMI is enabledInspect Geode configuration files (like gemfire.properties or geode.properties) for JMX manager settings, or check if the gfsh 'start jmx-manager' command was used with RMI configurationAffected if JMX over RMI is configured and accessible on the network, as this is the vulnerable component
-
Check network exposure of JMX serviceReview startup scripts or deployment configuration to determine if JMX/RMI ports are bound to non-localhost interfaces or are externally accessibleAffected if The JMX/RMI service is exposed on accessible network interfaces rather than localhost only
You are affected if you are running Apache Geode version 1.14.0, 1.13.0-1.13.4, or any version up to 1.12.5, on Java 8, with JMX over RMI enabled and accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to Apache Geode 1.15 with Java 11, or alternatively upgrade to 1.15 and enable the global serial filter with --J=-Dgeode.enableGlobalSerialFilter=true while configuring the serializable-object-filter for user classes.
Apache Geode 1.15.0
- Upgrade to Apache Geode 1.15.0 (the fixed release)
- Upgrade to Java 11 as recommended by the official advisory
- If upgrading to Java 11 is not possible, add the JVM argument '--J=-Dgeode.enableGlobalSerialFilter=true' when starting any Locator or Server processes
- Consult the Apache Geode documentation to configure the 'serializable-object-filter' option for any user classes that need to be serialized/deserialized
- Restart all Geode processes after applying the configuration changes
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA6.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $11,776.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-37021 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-37021 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data