GeodeApplication · Apache

CVE-2022-37022

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2022-08-31
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 1.13.2 or later.
See remediation →
94/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Apache Geode versions up to 1.12.2 and 1.13.2 are vulnerable to a deserialization of untrusted data flaw when using JMX over RMI on Java 11. Any user wishing to protect against deserialization attacks involving JMX or RMI should upgrade to Apache Geode 1.15. Use of 1.15 on Java 11 will automatically protect JMX over RMI against deserialization attacks. This should have no impact on performance since it only affects JMX/RMI which Gfsh uses to communicate with the JMX Manager which is hosted on a Locator.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Apache Geode versions up to 1.12.2 and 1.13.2 contain a deserialization of untrusted data vulnerability when using JMX over RMI on Java 11, which could allow remote code execution via malicious serialized objects.

MitigationUpgrade to Apache Geode 1.15 or later, which automatically protects JMX over RMI against deserialization attacks when running on Java 11.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
GeodeApplication
Affected:<= 1.12.2>= 1.13.0, <= 1.13.2

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed Apache Geode version
    Run 'gfsh version' or check the geode-core JAR manifest, or inspect the geode installation directory for version information
    Affected if Version is 1.12.2 or lower, or between 1.13.0 and 1.13.2 inclusive
  2. Verify Java version in use
    Run 'java -version' to confirm Java 11 is the runtime environment
    Affected if Java 11 is the active JDK/JRE version
  3. Confirm JMX over RMI is enabled
    Check configuration files (gemfire.properties, gfsh properties) for JMX manager configuration with RMI connector. Also check for environment variables like JMX_REMOTE_PORT or javax.management.remote.rmi.port that indicate RMI-based JMX is active
    Affected if JMX over RMI connector is configured and active

Environment is affected only if all three conditions are true: Apache Geode version is within 1.12.2 or lower, or 1.13.0-1.13.2, Java 11 is running, AND JMX over RMI is explicitly enabled/configured

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 1.13.2
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to Apache Geode 1.15 or later, which automatically protects JMX over RMI against deserialization attacks when running on Java 11.

Recommended fix High confidence

Apache Geode 1.15

  1. Stop all running Geode processes (locators, servers, and any Gfsh connections)
  2. Download Apache Geode 1.15 from the official Apache Geode distribution (https://geode.apache.org/releases/)
  3. Install Apache Geode 1.15 on all nodes in the cluster, replacing the previous installation
  4. Update any scripts, automation, or documentation that reference the old Geode version or installation paths
  5. Restart the Locator first to establish the JMX Manager
  6. Restart any servers and reconnect using Gfsh to verify the cluster is operational
  7. If running on Java 11, verify that JMX over RMI connections are now protected against deserialization attacks

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Geode Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation3.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
11.0 hours of engineering $1,900
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,040.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-37022 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-37022 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data