CVE-2017-18037
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe git repository tag rest resource in Atlassian Bitbucket Server from version 3.7.0 before 4.14.11 (the fixed version for 4.14.x), from version 5.0.0 before 5.0.9 (the fixed version for 5.0.x), from version 5.1.0 before 5.1.8 (the fixed version for 5.1.x), from version 5.2.0 before 5.2.6 (the fixed version for 5.2.x), from version 5.3.0 before 5.3.4 (the fixed version for 5.3.x), from version 5.4.0 before 5.4.2 (the fixed version for 5.4.x), from version 5.5.0 before 5.5.1 (the fixed version for 5.5.x) and before 5.6.0 allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via a path traversal vulnerability through the name of a git tag.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is a path traversal vulnerability in Atlassian Bitbucket Server's git repository tag REST API. Attackers can manipulate the git tag name parameter to include path traversal sequences (e.g., ../../), allowing unauthorized read access to arbitrary files on the server filesystem outside the intended repository directory.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 3.7.0, < 4.14.11>= 5.0.0, < 5.0.9>= 5.1.0, < 5.1.8>= 5.2.0, < 5.2.6>= 5.3.0, < 5.3.4>= 5.4.0, < 5.4.2= 5.5.0= 5.5.2= 5.5.3= 5.5.4= 5.5.5= 5.5.6CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Bitbucket Server versionCheck the Bitbucket interface by navigating to the administration settings, or examine the bitbucket-version.txt file in the Bitbucket home directory, or run: cd /opt/bitbucket && ./bin/version.sh or check the installation logsAffected if The installed version falls within any of these vulnerable ranges: 3.7.0 to 4.14.10, 5.0.0 to 5.0.8, 5.1.0 to 5.1.7, 5.2.0 to 5.2.5, 5.3.0 to 5.3.3, 5.4.0 to 5.4.1, or exactly 5.5.0, 5.5.2, 5.5.3, 5.5.4, 5.5.5, or 5.5.6
-
Confirm Bitbucket REST API is accessibleVerify the Bitbucket Server web interface and REST API endpoints are reachable over the network. The vulnerable endpoint is /rest/git/1.0/projects/{project}/repos/{repo}/tagsAffected if The REST API is externally accessible without proper authentication controls or the server is directly exposed to untrusted networks
-
Verify git repository tags functionality is in useCheck if any git repositories exist in Bitbucket that utilize the tagging feature, as the vulnerability specifically affects the tag REST API endpointAffected if Repositories with git tag functionality are present and the tag REST API endpoint is available
A user is affected if their Bitbucket Server version matches one of the vulnerable version ranges AND the REST API endpoint for git tags is accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data4.14.115.0.95.1.8
Upgrade Bitbucket Server to the fixed versions (4.14.11+, 5.0.9+, 5.1.8+, 5.2.6+, 5.3.4+, 5.4.2+, 5.5.1+, or 5.6.0+) to remediate this vulnerability.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-18037 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-18037 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data