Nx OsOperating system · Cisco

CVE-2017-6650

HIGH · 7.8 CVSS v3.0 Published 2017-05-22
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
80/100
Remediation priority · High
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A vulnerability in the Telnet CLI command of Cisco NX-OS System Software 7.1 through 7.3 running on Cisco Nexus Series Switches could allow an authenticated, local attacker to perform a command injection attack. The vulnerability is due to insufficient input validation of command arguments. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by injecting crafted command arguments into the Telnet CLI command. An exploit could allow the attacker to read or write arbitrary files at the user's privilege level outside of the user's path. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvb86771.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

A command injection vulnerability exists in the Telnet CLI command of Cisco NX-OS versions 7.1-7.3 running on Nexus Series Switches. Due to insufficient input validation of command arguments, an authenticated local attacker can inject crafted arguments to read or write arbitrary files at the user's privilege level outside of the user's normal path.

MitigationApply the relevant Cisco patch or upgrade to a fixed NX-OS version. If Telnet is not required, disable it entirely. Restrict local administrative access to prevent unauthorized authenticated sessions.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Nx OsOperating system
Affected:= 7.1\(1\)n1\(1\)= 7.1\(2\)n1\(1\)= 7.1\(3\)n1\(1\)= 7.1\(3\)n1\(2\)= 7.1\(3\)n1\(2.1\)= 7.1\(3\)n1\(3.12\)= 7.1\(4\)n1\(1\)= 7.2\(0\)d1\(0.437\)= 7.2\(0\)n1\(1\)= 7.2\(0\)zz\(99.1\)= 7.2\(1\)n1\(1\)= 7.3\(0\)n1\(1\)

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify NX-OS version
    Execute 'show version' or 'show version | include NXOS' in the CLI to retrieve the installed NX-OS version string
    Affected if The displayed version matches any of the following: 7.1(1)n1(1), 7.1(2)n1(1), 7.1(3)n1(1), 7.1(3)n1(2), 7.1(3)n1(2.1), 7.1(3)n1(3.12), 7.1(4)n1(1), 7.2(0)d1(0.437), 7.2(0)n1(1), 7.2(0)zz(99.1), 7.2(1)n1(1), 7.3(0)n1(1)
  2. Confirm Telnet service is enabled
    Execute 'show running-config | include telnet' or 'show telnet server' to check if the Telnet server is active
    Affected if Telnet is enabled and running on the device
  3. Verify local authentication configuration
    Execute 'show aaa authentication login' and review local user accounts with 'show user-account' to confirm whether local authentication is configured
    Affected if Local user authentication is configured, allowing authenticated attackers to access the Telnet CLI

You are affected if your device runs any of the listed NX-OS versions and has Telnet enabled with local authentication users present.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply the relevant Cisco patch or upgrade to a fixed NX-OS version. If Telnet is not required, disable it entirely. Restrict local administrative access to prevent unauthorized authenticated sessions.

Fix this in Nx Os Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
18.0 hours of engineering $3,200
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-6650 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-6650 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data