CVE-2018-0141
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in Cisco Prime Collaboration Provisioning (PCP) Software 11.6 could allow an unauthenticated, local attacker to log in to the underlying Linux operating system. The vulnerability is due to a hard-coded account password on the system. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by connecting to the affected system via Secure Shell (SSH) using the hard-coded credentials. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to access the underlying operating system as a low-privileged user. After low-level privileges are gained, the attacker could elevate to root privileges and take full control of the device. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvc82982.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceCisco Prime Collaboration Provisioning 11.6 contains a hard-coded account password that allows unauthenticated attackers to gain low-privileged SSH access to the underlying Linux OS. Successful authentication against this hard-coded credential provides an initial foothold, from which privilege escalation to root is possible.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 11.6= 11.6= 11.6CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Cisco Prime Collaboration versionRun 'show version' or check /opt/cpcu/VERSION file if the product is installed. Alternatively, query the application through its web interface or CLI.Affected if The installed version is exactly 11.6 for Cisco Prime Collaboration, Cisco Prime Collaboration Assurance, or Cisco Prime Collaboration Provisioning.
-
Verify SSH service accessibilityCheck if SSH port 22 is open and listening: run 'netstat -tlnp | grep :22' or 'ss -tlnp | grep :22'. Also verify SSH service status via 'systemctl status sshd' or similar.Affected if SSH is enabled and reachable from network, providing an attack vector for the hard-coded credential.
-
Inspect for the hard-coded accountReview /etc/passwd or /etc/shadow files (with appropriate privileges) for any unexpected or undocumented system accounts that could correspond to the hard-coded credential mentioned in CVE-2018-0141.Affected if An undocumented account exists that was not created by administrators and matches the hard-coded credential.
-
Review SSH authentication logsExamine /var/log/secure, /var/log/auth.log, or /var/log/messages for SSH login attempts. Search for successful logins from unusual source IPs or at unusual times.Affected if Successful SSH logins occurred using credentials that were not issued to legitimate administrators.
-
Audit for unauthorized access or privilege escalationCheck 'last' command output, review .bash_history for any unexpected commands, and look for new sudoers entries or modified /etc/sudoers file.Affected if Evidence exists of unauthorized shell access or attempts to escalate privileges to root.
A system is affected if it runs Cisco Prime Collaboration (Assurance or Provisioning) version 11.6 and has SSH accessible, as this version contains the hard-coded credential allowing unauthenticated SSH access.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the vendor patch from Cisco (CSCvc82982) to remove the hard-coded credentials. Additionally, disable unused SSH accounts, enforce key-based authentication, and audit systems for unauthorized access stemming from this vulnerability.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-0141 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-0141 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data