CVE-2018-0291
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) input packet processor of Cisco NX-OS Software could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to cause the SNMP application on an affected device to restart unexpectedly. The vulnerability is due to improper validation of SNMP protocol data units (PDUs) in SNMP packets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted SNMP packet to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause the SNMP application to restart multiple times, leading to a system-level restart and a denial of service (DoS) condition. This vulnerability affects Nexus 2000 Series Switches, Nexus 3000 Series Switches, Nexus 3500 Platform Switches, Nexus 3600 Platform Switches, Nexus 5500 Platform Switches, Nexus 5600 Platform Switches, Nexus 6000 Series Switches, Nexus 7000 Series Switches, Nexus 7700 Series Switches, Nexus 9000 Series Switches in standalone NX-OS mode, Nexus 9500 R-Series Line Cards and Fabric Modules, UCS 6100 Series Fabric Interconnects, UCS 6200 Series Fabric Interconnects, UCS 6300 Series Fabric Interconnects. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCuw99630, CSCvg71290, CSCvj67977.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA vulnerability in the SNMP input packet processor of Cisco NX-OS Software allows an authenticated, remote attacker to cause unexpected SNMP application restarts by sending crafted SNMP packets with improperly validated PDUs. Repeated exploitation can trigger system-level restarts, resulting in denial of service across multiple Nexus switch series and UCS fabric interconnects.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 6.0, < 7.3\(3\)n1\(1\)>= 6.2, < 8.1\(2\)< 7.0\(3\)i3>= 7.0\(3\)i4, < 7.0\(3\)i7\(1\)= 7.0< 2.2>= 2.5, < 3.2\(2b\)CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify NX-OS versionRun 'show version' on the Cisco NX-OS device and locate the 'system:' or 'NX-OS' version lineAffected if The running version falls within any of these ranges: >= 6.0 and < 7.3(3)n1(1); >= 6.2 and < 8.1(2); < 7.0(3)i3; >= 7.0(3)i4 and < 7.0(3)i7(1); equals 7.0; < 2.2; >= 2.5 and < 3.2(2b)
-
Verify SNMP is enabledRun 'show snmp' and check if SNMP is listed as enabled; also run 'show running-config | include snmp' to see SNMP configuration linesAffected if SNMP is enabled (any community string or user configured) on an affected version
-
Check SNMP configuration detailsRun 'show snmp community' to view community strings, and 'show snmp user' to see SNMPv3 usersAffected if SNMPv1/v2c with plaintext community strings or SNMPv3 with weak/no authentication is configured
-
Identify SNMP access controlRun 'show snmp acl' or check the running configuration for SNMP access lists attached to SNMPAffected if SNMP is accessible from non-management networks or has no ACL restrictions
-
Review recent SNMP-related process restartsRun 'show system internal sysmgr service name snmp' to check SNMP process uptime; check 'show logging' for 'SNMP' or 'snmp' process restart messagesAffected if Multiple unexpected SNMP process restarts are logged
The device is affected if it runs a vulnerable NX-OS version AND has SNMP enabled, regardless of SNMP ACLs, because the attacker only needs valid SNMP credentials to exploit the flaw.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data2.23.27.0
Apply Cisco's software patches for the identified bug IDs (CSCuw99630, CSCvg71290, CSCvj67977). As interim measures, disable SNMP if unused, restrict SNMP access to authorized management stations via ACLs, and consider SNMPv3 with authentication/encryption.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,448.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-0291 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-0291 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data