CVE-2018-0293
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in role-based access control (RBAC) for Cisco NX-OS Software could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to execute CLI commands that should be restricted for a nonadministrative user. The attacker would have to possess valid user credentials for the device. The vulnerability is due to incorrect RBAC privilege assignment for certain CLI commands. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by authenticating to a device as a nonadministrative user and executing specific commands from the CLI. An exploit could allow the attacker to run commands that should be restricted to administrative users. These commands could modify the configuration or boot image on the device. This vulnerability affects MDS 9000 Series Multilayer Switches, Nexus 2000 Series Switches, Nexus 3000 Series Switches, Nexus 3500 Platform Switches, Nexus 3600 Platform Switches, Nexus 5500 Platform Switches, Nexus 5600 Platform Switches, Nexus 6000 Series Switches, Nexus 7000 Series Switches, Nexus 7700 Series Switches, Nexus 9000 Series Switches in standalone NX-OS mode, Nexus 9500 R-Series Line Cards and Fabric Modules. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvd77904.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA vulnerability in the role-based access control (RBAC) implementation of Cisco NX-OS Software allows authenticated non-administrative users to execute CLI commands that should be restricted to administrative users due to incorrect RBAC privilege assignment for certain CLI commands. This could enable an attacker with valid non-admin credentials to modify device configuration or boot images.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 6.0, < 7.3\(3\)n1\(1\)= 7.3\(2\)n1\(0.395\)= 8.1\(0.112\)s0>= 7.0\(3\)i4, < 7.0\(3\)i7\(1\)>= 6.0, < 7.0\(3\)i7\(2\)>= 5.2, < 8.1\(1\)CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check NX-OS versionExecute `show version` on the device CLI and locate the NX-OS release string (for example, 7.0(3)i7(1) or 6.0(2))Affected if The version falls within any of these ranges: 6.0 to 7.3(3)n1(1), 7.3(2)n1(1)(0.395), 8.1(0)(112)s0, 7.0(3)i4 to 7.0(3)i7(1), 6.0 to 7.0(3)i7(2), or 5.2 to 8.1(1)
-
Identify configured usersExecute `show user-account` or `show running-config | include username` to list all locally configured user accountsAffected if Any non-administrative user accounts exist on the device (users with roles other than network-admin)
-
Review RBAC role assignmentsExecute `show role` to list all configured roles, then `show role detail <role-name>` for each custom role to inspect permitted commandsAffected if Any role assigned to non-admin users permits commands restricted to administrative users (such as configuration modification, boot variables, or system image management)
-
Verify current user sessionsExecute `show users` to display active logged-in sessions and their associated rolesAffected if Any non-admin user is currently authenticated and running with elevated privileges
The device is affected if the NX-OS version matches the affected version ranges AND non-administrative users have been assigned roles that inadvertently grant access to restricted CLI commands.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data7.07.38.1
Apply the Cisco software update addressing CSCvd77904 and review RBAC role configurations to ensure non-administrative users only have access to appropriate CLI commands.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-0293 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-0293 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data