Github Pull Request BuilderApplication · Jenkins

CVE-2018-1000142

HIGH · 7.8 CVSS v3.0 Published 2018-04-05
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 1.39.0 or later.
See remediation →
80/100
Remediation priority · High
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
An exposure of sensitive information vulnerability exists in Jenkins GitHub Pull Request Builder Plugin version 1.39.0 and older in GhprbCause.java that allows an attacker with local file system access to obtain GitHub credentials.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The Jenkins GitHub Pull Request Builder Plugin versions 1.39.0 and older contains a file exposure vulnerability in GhprbCause.java that allows an attacker with local file system access to read stored GitHub credentials from the Jenkins environment.

MitigationUpgrade the GitHub Pull Request Builder Plugin to a version newer than 1.39.0 and rotate all GitHub credentials that may have been exposed.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Github Pull Request BuilderApplication
Affected:<= 1.39.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check if GitHub Pull Request Builder plugin is installed
    Navigate to Jenkins > Manage Jenkins > Manage Plugins > Installed and search for 'GitHub Pull Request Builder' or 'ghprb'. Alternatively, check the plugin directory at $JENKINS_HOME/plugins for a folder starting with 'ghprb'.
    Affected if The plugin is installed and present in the Jenkins plugins directory
  2. Determine the installed version of the plugin
    In Jenkins UI, go to Manage Jenkins > Manage Plugins > Installed and locate 'GitHub Pull Request Builder' in the list to view its version. If using CLI, inspect the plugin's manifest file at $JENKINS_HOME/plugins/ghprb/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF for the Plugin-Version attribute.
    Affected if The version is 1.39.0 or older, or the version cannot be determined (older unversioned installations)
  3. Verify if GitHub credentials are configured in Jenkins
    Check for stored GitHub credentials in Jenkins > Credentials (look for credentials of type 'Username with password' or 'Secret text' that reference GitHub or GitHub API tokens). Also check the plugin configuration at Manage Jenkins > Configure System > GitHub Pull Request Builder for stored API tokens or OAuth tokens.
    Affected if GitHub credentials (usernames, passwords, API tokens, or OAuth tokens) are stored in Jenkins credentials or plugin configuration
  4. Check file permissions on Jenkins home directory
    Review file permissions on $JENKINS_HOME and subdirectories, particularly $JENKINS_HOME/credentials.xml and $JENKINS_HOME/secrets/. Ensure world-readable or group-readable permissions exist that would allow local unprivileged users to access these files.
    Affected if The Jenkins home directory or credential storage files have overly permissive access controls allowing unauthorized local file system access

A user is affected if the GitHub Pull Request Builder plugin version is 1.39.0 or older AND GitHub credentials are stored in the Jenkins environment, especially if the file system has permissive access controls.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 1.39.0
Interim mitigation

Upgrade the GitHub Pull Request Builder Plugin to a version newer than 1.39.0 and rotate all GitHub credentials that may have been exposed.

Fix this in Github Pull Request Builder Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
10.0 hours of engineering $1,720
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,752.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-1000142 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-1000142 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data