CVE-2023-24434
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins GitHub Pull Request Builder Plugin 1.42.2 and earlier allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified URL using attacker-specified credentials IDs obtained through another method, capturing credentials stored in Jenkins.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is a CSRF vulnerability in the Jenkins GitHub Pull Request Builder Plugin (version 1.42.2 and earlier). The flaw allows attackers to trigger Jenkins to make outbound connections to attacker-controlled URLs using credentials IDs that they specify, potentially exfiltrating stored Jenkins credentials that match those IDs.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 1.42.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify GitHub Pull Request Builder plugin is installedLog into Jenkins as an administrator, navigate to Manage Jenkins > Manage Plugins > Installed tab, and search for 'GitHub Pull Request Builder' or 'ghprb' in the list of installed plugins. Alternatively, check the plugin manifest file at $JENKINS_HOME/plugins/ghprb/META-INF/MANIFEST.MFAffected if The plugin appears in the list of installed plugins
-
Check the installed plugin versionIn the Installed Plugins list, locate the GitHub Pull Request Builder plugin and note the Version column. If using CLI, run: jenkins-plugin-cli --list --filter ghprb or inspect the MANIFEST.MF file for the Plugin-Version attributeAffected if The version listed is 1.42.2 or earlier, or if the version cannot be determined (older plugin without version metadata)
-
Confirm plugin is enabled and loadedNavigate to Manage Jenkins > Manage Plugins > Installed tab and verify the GitHub Pull Request Builder plugin shows as 'Enabled'. Check the Jenkins logs at $JENKINS_HOME/logs for entries containing 'ghprb' or 'GitHub Pull Request Builder' during startup to confirm the plugin loaded successfullyAffected if The plugin is enabled and was loaded by Jenkins at startup
-
Identify if the plugin API is accessibleCheck if the Jenkins web UI responds to /ghprb/ endpoints or review Jenkins security configuration under Manage Jenkins > Global Security to see if the plugin exposes any unauthenticated or CSRF-vulnerable endpoints. Use a tool like curl to probe: curl -s -o /dev/null -w '%{http_code}' http://YOUR_JENKINS/ghprb/api/jsonAffected if The plugin API endpoints are accessible without proper CSRF protection (the vulnerable condition)
-
Review credential usage in plugin configurationNavigate to the plugin configuration page (typically under Manage Jenkins > Configure System > GitHub Pull Request Builder or job-specific configuration) and identify any configured credentials. Note the credential IDs configured, as these are the IDs an attacker could target in an exploitAffected if Credentials are configured and assigned to the plugin (exposing them to potential exfiltration via the CSRF flaw)
You are affected if the GitHub Pull Request Builder plugin is installed, enabled, running version 1.42.2 or earlier, and has credentials configured for its use.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate the Jenkins GitHub Pull Request Builder Plugin to a version newer than 1.42.2, or disable the plugin if not in use.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,752.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-24434 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-24434 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data