CVE-2023-24435
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA missing permission check in Jenkins GitHub Pull Request Builder Plugin 1.42.2 and earlier allows attackers with Overall/Read permission to connect to an attacker-specified URL using attacker-specified credentials IDs obtained through another method, capturing credentials stored in Jenkins.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Jenkins GitHub Pull Request Builder Plugin versions 1.42.2 and earlier lacks proper permission checks, allowing any user with Overall/Read access to specify arbitrary URLs and credentials IDs to exfiltrate stored Jenkins credentials. This is an authorization bypass where the plugin fails to verify that users have appropriate permissions before allowing credential usage.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 1.42.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify GitHub Pull Request Builder Plugin is installedNavigate to Manage Jenkins > Manage Plugins > Installed, or inspect $JENKINS_HOME/plugins/ for github-pull-request-builder.jpi or .hpiAffected if Plugin file exists in the plugins directory
-
Determine installed plugin versionIn Jenkins UI: Manage Jenkins > Manage Plugins > Installed > GitHub Pull Request Builder > Version. Alternatively, unzip the plugin .jpi file and read META-INF/MANIFEST.MF for the Plugin-Version attributeAffected if Version listed is 1.42.2 or earlier
-
Confirm credential configurationNavigate to job configuration or global configuration where the plugin stores credentials (often under Build Settings > GitHub Pull Request Builder or Configure System > GitHub > Pull Request Builder). Inspect stored credentials IDsAffected if Any credentials IDs are configured for use with the plugin
-
Audit Overall/Read permission assignmentsNavigate to Manage Jenkins > Manage and Assign Users > Assign Roles, or inspect $JENKINS_HOME/confighudson.security.AuthorizationMatrixProperty if used. Review which users or groups have Overall/Read permissionAffected if Any user or group with Overall/Read permission is untrusted or outside the security boundary
Environment is affected if GitHub Pull Request Builder Plugin version is 1.42.2 or earlier AND the plugin has configured credentials AND untrusted users possess Overall/Read permission.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade the GitHub Pull Request Builder Plugin to version 1.42.3 or later, which includes the missing permission check. If immediate patching is not possible, restrict Overall/Read permission to trusted users only.
GitHub Pull Request Builder version 1.42.3 or later
- Navigate to Jenkins dashboard
- Go to Manage Jenkins > Manage Plugins
- Click on the 'Installed' tab
- Locate 'GitHub Pull Request Builder' plugin in the list
- If an update is available, select it and click 'Download now and install after restart'
- Alternatively, go to the 'Available' tab and search for the plugin to check for newer versions
- After upgrading, restart Jenkins to apply the changes
- Verify the plugin version is 1.42.3 or later
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,480.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-24435 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-24435 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data