CVE-2018-11864
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedBytes can be written to fuses from Secure region which can be read later by HLOS in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Compute, Snapdragon Connectivity, Snapdragon Consumer Electronics Connectivity, Snapdragon Consumer IOT, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon Mobile, Snapdragon Voice & Music, Snapdragon Wired Infrastructure and Networking in versions IPQ8074, MDM9150, MDM9206, MDM9607, MDM9650, MDM9655, MSM8996AU, QCA8081, QCS605, SD 210/SD 212/SD 205, SD 410/12, SD 425, SD 427, SD 430, SD 435, SD 439 / SD 429, SD 450, SD 625, SD 632, SD 636, SD 650/52, SD 675, SD 712 / SD 710 / SD 670, SD 820, SD 820A, SD 835, SD 845 / SD 850, SD 8CX, SDA660, SDM439, SDM630, SDM660, Snapdragon_High_Med_2016, SXR1130.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceFuse programming permissions are incorrectly configured, allowing data written to one-time programmable fuses from a Secure region to be readable by the High-Level Operating System (HLOS). This exposes potentially sensitive security-critical data that should remain confined to the secure environment.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify chipset modelCheck the processor/chipset information using commands like 'cat /proc/cpuinfo', 'dmesg | grep -i qualcomm', or check boot logs for the Qualcomm chipset identifier (e.g., ipq8074, mdm9150, mdm9206, mdm9607, mdm9650, mdm9655, msm8996au, qca8081)Affected if The chipset matches one of the affected models: Ipq8074, Mdm9150, Mdm9206, Mdm9607, Mdm9650, Mdm9655, Msm8996au, or Qca8081
-
Check firmware versionRetrieve the firmware version from the device using 'cat /proc/version', 'cat /sys/firmware/devicetree/base/model', or vendor-specific commands like 'cat /proc/athrs17_version' for router platforms. Compare against the affected version range.Affected if The device runs any firmware version on the affected Qualcomm chipsets listed above (all versions are affected)
-
Identify secure world configurationCheck if the device implements TrustZone or a secure world environment by reviewing boot logs for 'tz' or 'trustzone' references, or by examining /proc/tee for Trusted Execution Environment informationAffected if The device uses a secure region (TrustZone) for sensitive operations, indicating the vulnerability potentially applies
-
Check for fuse-related servicesLook for fuse programming or OTP (one-time programmable) services in the system by searching for 'fuse', 'otp', 'efuse' in /proc, /sys, or running processes using 'ps' or 'grep -r fuse /proc'Affected if The device implements fuse/OTP programming functionality, which is the attack surface for this vulnerability
-
Verify data exposure from HLOSAttempt to read fuse data from the HLOS perspective using vendor-specific diagnostic interfaces if available (e.g., qfprom or similar nodes in /sys or /dev). Check if non-privileged users can access what should be secure fuse regions.Affected if Fuse data programmed from the secure region is readable by the HLOS (normal behavior for unaffected systems would be access denied or empty read)
A user is affected if their device uses any of the listed Qualcomm chipset firmware versions and implements fuse programming, since the vulnerable configuration allows secure-region fuse data to leak to the HLOS.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor firmware/security updates from Qualcomm when available. Until then, treat any fuse-programmed data as potentially exposed to the HLOS and avoid using fuses for sensitive secrets.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,592.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-11864 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-11864 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data