CVE-2018-11938
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper input validation for argument received from HLOS can lead to buffer overflows and unexpected behavior in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Compute, Snapdragon Connectivity, Snapdragon Consumer Electronics Connectivity, Snapdragon Consumer IOT, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon IoT, Snapdragon Mobile, Snapdragon Voice & Music, Snapdragon Wearables, Snapdragon Wired Infrastructure and Networking in versions IPQ8074, MDM9150, MDM9206, MDM9607, MDM9650, MSM8909W, MSM8996AU, QCA8081, QCS605, SD 210/SD 212/SD 205, SD 410/12, SD 425, SD 427, SD 430, SD 435, SD 439 / SD 429, SD 450, SD 615/16/SD 415, SD 625, SD 632, SD 636, SD 650/52, SD 675, SD 712 / SD 710 / SD 670, SD 820, SD 820A, SD 835, SD 845 / SD 850, SD 8CX, SDA660, SDM439, SDM630, SDM660, Snapdragon_High_Med_2016, SXR1130.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceImproper input validation in Snapdragon firmware for arguments received from the High-Level Operating System (HLOS) allows malformed inputs to trigger buffer overflows, potentially leading to code execution or system instability. The vulnerability affects baseband and peripheral subsystems in mobile, IoT, compute, and networking chipsets.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the chipset modelCheck the device specifications, system information, or hardware ID. On Linux systems, try 'cat /proc/cpuinfo' or check '/sys/class/*' entries. On Android, check 'Settings > About Phone' or use 'getprop' command. For networking equipment, consult the datasheet or administrative interface.Affected if The chipset model matches one of these: Ipq8074, Mdm9150, Mdm9206, Mdm9607, Msm8909w, Msm8996au, or Qca8081
-
Confirm it is a Qualcomm Snapdragon deviceVerify the device uses a Qualcomm Snapdragon chipset by checking the product documentation, boot logs, or running 'lspci' or 'lsusb' to list hardware components.Affected if The device is not manufactured by Qualcomm or does not use a Snapdragon chipset, the device is likely not affected by this specific CVE.
-
Check firmware versionAccess the firmware version through the device's administrative interface, boot logs, or firmware update mechanism. For mobile devices, check 'Settings > About Phone > Build Number' or use 'getprop ro.build.version.incremental'. For IoT/network devices, consult the management console or use 'cat /proc/version'.Affected if All firmware versions of the affected chipsets are vulnerable; the presence of any unpatched firmware version confirms exposure.
-
Determine if HLOS interfaces are accessibleCheck whether applications or network services can send inputs to baseband or peripheral subsystems. On mobile devices, this relates to modem communication. On IoT/network devices, check if external APIs, debug ports, or network services can pass data to the baseband processor.Affected if The device accepts untrusted inputs from applications or network sources to the baseband/peripheral subsystems, increasing exploitation likelihood.
A device is affected if it uses any of the listed Qualcomm chipset models (Ipq8074, Mdm9150, Mdm9206, Mdm9607, Msm8909w, Msm8996au, Qca8081) and runs any firmware version, particularly if it exposes interfaces to the HLOS that can receive malformed inputs.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor-supplied firmware updates from OEMs/device manufacturers. Until patches are available, limit attack surface by avoiding untrusted HLOS applications and network inputs to affected devices.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation40.0 h
- Testing24.0 h
- Review / QA12.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $23,296.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-11938 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-11938 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data