CVE-2018-1461
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIBM SAN Volume Controller, IBM Storwize, IBM Spectrum Virtualize and IBM FlashSystem products ( 6.1, 6.2, 6.3, 6.4, 7.1, 7.2, 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, 7.6, 7.6.1, 7.7, 7.7.1, 7.8, 7.8.1, 8.1, and 8.1.1) are vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. IBM X-Force ID: 140362.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is a stored/persistent cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Web UI of IBM SAN Volume Controller, Storwize, Spectrum Virtualize, and FlashSystem storage products. An authenticated user can embed malicious JavaScript code into Web UI fields that executes when other users view the affected content, potentially stealing session credentials or performing actions on behalf of victims.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 6.1.0.0, < 7.5.0.14>= 7.7.0.0, < 7.7.1.9>= 7.8.0.0, < 7.8.1.6>= 8.1.1.0, < 8.1.1.2>= 8.1.2.0, < 8.1.2.1>= 6.1.0.0, < 7.5.0.14>= 7.7.0.0, < 7.7.1.9>= 7.8.0.0, < 7.8.1.6>= 8.1.1.0, < 8.1.1.2>= 8.1.2.0, < 8.1.2.1>= 6.1.0.0, < 7.5.0.14>= 7.7.0.0, < 7.7.1.9>= 7.8.0.0, < 7.8.1.6>= 8.1.1.0, < 8.1.1.2>= 8.1.2.0, < 8.1.2.1>= 6.1.0.0, < 7.5.0.14>= 7.7.0.0, < 7.7.1.9>= 7.8.0.0, < 7.8.1.6>= 8.1.1.0, < 8.1.1.2>= 8.1.2.0, < 8.1.2.1>= 6.1.0.0, < 7.5.0.14>= 7.7.0.0, < 7.7.1.9>= 7.8.0.0, < 7.8.1.6>= 8.1.1.0, < 8.1.1.2>= 8.1.2.0, < 8.1.2.1>= 6.1.0.0, < 7.5.0.14>= 7.7.0.0, < 7.7.1.9>= 7.8.0.0, < 7.8.1.6>= 8.1.1.0, < 8.1.1.2>= 8.1.2.0, < 8.1.2.1>= 6.1.0.0, < 7.5.0.14>= 7.7.0.0, < 7.7.1.9>= 7.8.0.0, < 7.8.1.6>= 8.1.1.0, < 8.1.1.2>= 8.1.2.0, < 8.1.2.1>= 6.1.0.0, < 7.5.0.14>= 7.7.0.0, < 7.7.1.9>= 7.8.0.0, < 7.8.1.6>= 8.1.1.0, < 8.1.1.2>= 8.1.2.0, < 8.1.2.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the product modelLog into the system CLI and run 'lssystem' or 'lsversion' to display the product name and model number. Alternatively, access the Web UI login page which typically displays the firmware version.Affected if The product is one of: IBM Storwize V7000, V5000, V3700, V3500, V9000, SAN Volume Controller, Spectrum Virtualize, or Spectrum Virtualize for Public Cloud
-
Determine the firmware versionIn the CLI, run 'lsversion' or 'lssystem' to obtain the exact firmware version installed on the storage system.Affected if The version falls within any of these ranges: >= 6.1.0.0 and < 7.5.0.14; >= 7.7.0.0 and < 7.7.1.9; >= 7.8.0.0 and < 7.8.1.6; >= 8.1.1.0 and < 8.1.1.2; >= 8.1.2.0 and < 8.1.2.1
-
Confirm Web UI is accessibleAttempt to reach the Web UI by entering the management IP address in a web browser. Verify the login page loads successfully.Affected if The Web UI is reachable and accepts authentication (the vulnerability requires the Web UI to be enabled and accessible)
-
Check for any existing patchesReview the system health or update status in the Web UI under Settings > Updates or similar, or consult IBM support documentation for the installed product version.Affected if No patches have been applied to bring the version to 7.5.0.14, 7.7.1.9, 7.8.1.6, 8.1.1.2, or 8.1.2.1 or higher
If the product is an affected IBM storage model and the firmware version falls within any of the vulnerable ranges listed, the environment is likely affected by this stored XSS vulnerability in the Web UI.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data7.5.0.147.7.1.97.8.1.6
Apply the relevant IBM firmware/software patches for this vulnerability (consult IBM support for specific fix versions per product). Restrict Web UI access to trusted users only until patches are applied.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-1461 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-1461 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data