CVE-2018-5488
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedNetApp SANtricity Web Services Proxy versions 1.10.x000.0002 through 2.12.X000.0002 and SANtricity Storage Manager 11.30.0X00.0004 through 11.42.0X00.0001 ship with the Java Management Extension Remote Method Invocation (JMX RMI) service bound to the network, and are susceptible to unauthenticated remote code execution.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe NetApp SANtricity Web Services Proxy and Storage Manager ship with the Java Management Extension Remote Method Invocation (JMX RMI) service exposed on the network without authentication. This allows remote attackers to inject and execute arbitrary Java code on the affected system by leveraging the unprotected JMX RMI interface, resulting in complete system compromise.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 11.30.0x00.0004, <= 11.42.0x00.0001>= 1.10.x000.0002, <= 2.12.x000.0002CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed SANtricity product and versionLocate the SANtricity Storage Manager or Web Services Proxy installation directory and check the version information file or executable properties. Common locations include /opt/netapp/santricity or Program Files\NetApp\SANtricity on Windows. Use 'smversion' command or check version files in the installation directory.Affected if The installed version falls within 11.30.0x00.0004 to 11.42.0x00.0001 for Storage Manager, or 1.10.x000.0002 to 2.12.x000.0002 for Web Services Proxy.
-
Verify JMX RMI service is runningCheck for running Java processes related to SANtricity. On Linux/Unix, use 'ps aux | grep -i santricity' or 'ps aux | grep java'. On Windows, check services or running processes for JMX-related entries. Look for JMX RMI registry processes typically listening on ports 1099 or 30000-39999 range.Affected if JMX RMI service process is actively running as part of SANtricity.
-
Check network binding configurationDetermine which network interfaces the JMX RMI service is bound to. Use 'netstat -anp' or 'ss -anp' on Linux to see if the JMX RMI port is listening on 0.0.0.0 (all interfaces) rather than 127.0.0.1 (localhost only). On Windows, use 'netstat -ano' or check service configuration.Affected if The JMX RMI port is listening on 0.0.0.0 or an external network interface, making it accessible from other hosts.
-
Confirm remote accessibilityFrom a different host on the network, attempt to connect to the JMX RMI port using a tool like 'nc -zv <target> <port>' or 'telnet <target> <port>' to verify the port is exposed externally, not just locally accessible.Affected if The JMX RMI port responds to connection attempts from remote systems, indicating network exposure.
You are affected if SANtricity Storage Manager or Web Services Proxy is installed within the vulnerable version range AND the JMX RMI service is running and accessible from network addresses other than localhost.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedDisable or restrict the JMX RMI service, apply network segmentation to prevent external access, or upgrade to a patched version of SANtricity Web Services Proxy and SANtricity Storage Manager beyond the affected versions.
SANtricity Storage Manager >= 11.42.0x00.0002 or SANtricity Web Services Proxy >= 2.12.x000.0003
- 1. Identify the currently installed SANtricity Storage Manager or SANtricity Web Services Proxy version
- 2. Download the latest patched version from the NetApp support portal at https://mysupport.netapp.com
- 3. For SANtricity Storage Manager, upgrade to version 11.42.0x00.0002 or later
- 4. For SANtricity Web Services Proxy, upgrade to version 2.12.x000.0003 or later
- 5. Verify the upgrade completed successfully by checking the product version
- 6. Confirm the JMX RMI service is no longer exposed to unauthenticated network access
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-5488 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-5488 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data