CVE-2019-1612
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the CLI of Cisco NX-OS Software could allow an authenticated, local attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying operating system of an affected device. The vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of arguments passed to certain CLI commands. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by including malicious input as the argument of an affected command. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying operating system with elevated privileges. An attacker would need valid administrator credentials to exploit this vulnerability. Nexus 3000 Series Switches are affected running software versions prior to 7.0(3)I4(9) and 7.0(3)I7(4). Nexus 3500 Platform Switches are affected running software versions prior to 7.0(3)I7(4). Nexus 3600 Platform Switches are affected running software versions prior to 7.0(3)F3(5). Nexus 9000 Series Switches in Stand are affected running software versions prior to 7.0(3)F3(5).
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAuthenticated command injection vulnerability in Cisco NX-OS CLI where insufficient validation of arguments passed to certain CLI commands allows an attacker with administrator credentials to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying operating system with elevated privileges.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 7.0\(3\), < 7.0\(3\)i7\(6\)>= 7.0\(3\)i5, < 7.0\(3\)i7\(6\)>= 7.0\(3\)f3, < 7.0\(3\)f3\(5\)< 7.0\(3\)f3\(5\)>= 7.0\(3\)f1, < 7.0\(3\)f3\(5\)CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the NX-OS versionRun 'show version' in the NX-OS CLI and note the 'NXOS' version number displayed (e.g., 7.0(3)I7(5))Affected if The displayed version falls within these ranges: 7.0(3)I5(x), 7.0(3)I7(0-5), 7.0(3)F1(x), or 7.0(3)F3(0-4)
-
Confirm administrator credentials existCheck if any local user accounts with 'network-admin' or 'privilege 15' exist using 'show users' or 'show running-config | include username'Affected if Any administrator-level accounts are configured on the device (this is required for the attacker to have valid credentials)
-
Check if CLI access is exposedReview the device's management access configuration with 'show running-config | include interface mgmt' and 'show ip access-list' to see if the management interface (typically mgmt0) is reachable from untrusted networksAffected if The management interface is accessible from networks outside the trusted administrative zone (e.g., internet, guest networks, or other untrusted segments)
The device is affected if it runs an NX-OS version in the 7.0(3)I5, 7.0(3)I7(0-5), 7.0(3)F1, or 7.0(3)F3(0-4) trains AND has administrator accounts that could be compromised by an untrusted user with CLI access.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data7.0
Apply the vendor software updates (7.0(3)I4(9), 7.0(3)I7(4), or 7.0(3)F3(5) depending on platform) to fix the argument validation. Until patched, restrict administrative CLI access to trusted personnel only.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-1612 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-1612 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data