CVE-2019-1778
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the CLI of Cisco NX-OS Software could allow an authenticated, local attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying Linux operating system with the privilege level of root. The vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of arguments passed to a specific CLI command on the affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by including malicious input as the argument of an affected command. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying Linux operating system with elevated privileges. An attacker would need valid administrator credentials to exploit this vulnerability.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceCommand injection vulnerability in Cisco NX-OS CLI where insufficient argument validation on a specific CLI command allows an authenticated administrator to execute arbitrary Linux commands with root privileges by injecting malicious input.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 7.0\(3\)i4\(9\)>= 7.0\(3\)i7, < 7.0\(3\)i7\(4\)>= 7.0\(3\), < 7.0\(3\)f3\(5\)CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed NX-OS versionRun 'show version' in the NX-OS CLI and locate the 'NX-OS' or 'system: version' line in the outputAffected if The displayed version falls into any of these ranges: < 7.0(3)i4(9), >= 7.0(3)i7 but < 7.0(3)i7(4), or >= 7.0(3) but < 7.0(3)f3(5)
-
Verify NX-OS release trainIdentify the full release train string (for example 7.0(3)i7(2)) from the 'show version' outputAffected if The release train indicates an unpatched version within the affected ranges listed above
-
Confirm administrative access existsReview user accounts with privileged (admin) level access using 'show user-account' or 'show running-config | include username'Affected if Any user account with admin/privilege 15 level access exists on the system (the vulnerability requires authenticated admin privileges to exploit)
-
Identify use of the vulnerable commandAudit CLI command history or configuration for any custom or diagnostic commands that perform system-level operations; the vulnerability lies in insufficient argument validation on a specific CLI commandAffected if A CLI command accepting user-supplied arguments is in use or was recently executed, and the system version is within the affected ranges
The environment is affected if NX-OS version falls within < 7.0(3)i4(9), >= 7.0(3)i7 to < 7.0(3)i7(4), or >= 7.0(3) to < 7.0(3)f3(5) AND an authenticated administrator can access the specific vulnerable CLI command.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data7.0
Apply Cisco-provided patches for NX-OS; restrict administrative access to trusted personnel and monitor CLI command usage for suspicious patterns.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,656.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-1778 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-1778 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data